Upgrade Storagewrong formatting of "bare" citation numbers (Word plugin)
The Royal Chemical Society style requires the citation numbers to be printed without any "suffixes". However, if we don't use a suffix after citation number in style definition, and choose <option name="second-field-align" value="margin"/>, it is not possible to avoid collision of citation numbers with author's names, like in
9 M. N. Glukhovtsev, A. Pross, M. P. McGrath, and L. Radom, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 103, 1878-1885.
10G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B, 1993, 47, 558.
At the same time the Zotero Reference test pane produces correct output.
Of course, I added dots after citation numbers (this case is handled correctly by Word plugin), as it is definitely acceptable for RSC and such numeration is used in its own Endnote style files. However, I still think that the bug requires correction.
I am using Zotero 1.5b2 and Word plugin 1.0b4 with Word 2000
9 M. N. Glukhovtsev, A. Pross, M. P. McGrath, and L. Radom, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 103, 1878-1885.
10G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B, 1993, 47, 558.
At the same time the Zotero Reference test pane produces correct output.
Of course, I added dots after citation numbers (this case is handled correctly by Word plugin), as it is definitely acceptable for RSC and such numeration is used in its own Endnote style files. However, I still think that the bug requires correction.
I am using Zotero 1.5b2 and Word plugin 1.0b4 with Word 2000