Style Request: The Plant Genome

Hello,

I'm working on submitting a manuscript for 'The Plant Genome'. I used 'American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America'. Instead of DOI for online articles, this CSL is providing weblink.

Can someone create a CSL for The Plant Genome journal. This would help everyone planning to submit to Plant Genome.

Thanks,
Sandeep


Example for Plant Genome reference list:
Bretscher M.S., Clotworthy M. (2007) Using single loxP sites to enhance homologous recombination: ts mutants in Sec1 of Dictyostelium discoideum. PLoS ONE 2:e724. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000724.
Casa A.M., Pressoir G., Brown P.J., Mitchell S.E., Rooney W.L., Tuinstra M.R., Franks C.D., Kresovich S. (2008) Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Science 48:30-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0080.

Online ISSN: 1940-3372

Link to online style documentation:
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/tpg/author-instructions

Link to a recent article:
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/tpg/articles/9/3/plantgenome2015.11.0110
  • Please keep the discussion in your other thread. It is hard to follow requests if you make duplicate threads.

    Also, per the instructions @damnation linked to in the other thread (https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/wiki/Requesting-Styles), we need you to give formatted versions of the exact two specific references given on that page (the Campbell/Pedersen one and the Mares one), not any random reference.
  • Sorry for not providing references in specific format. Below are the specific references. Thanks

    In-text citation: e.g. (Campbell and Pedersen, 2007)

    Campbell, J.L., and O.K. Pedersen. 2007. The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success. Comp. Pol. Studies 40(3):307–332. DOI:10.1177/0010414006286542

    Mares, I. 2001. Firms and the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter to employers? In: P. A. Hall and D. Soskice, editors, Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, New York. p. 184–213.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.