typohgraphical issue: apostrophe
I noticed that Zotero will in some cases insert vertical/typewriter apostrophes (as opposed to the typographic/curly apostrophe. This happens for instance when a title has a word in single quotation marks. It also occurs in pre/suffixes.
I'm wondering if there is a way to change this in the settings. Otherwise I'd have to manually find and replace them before sending a text to the publisher, which is just one more (and slightly error-prone) step.
(Note that my OOo settings have curly apostrophes set as standard.)
I'm wondering if there is a way to change this in the settings. Otherwise I'd have to manually find and replace them before sending a text to the publisher, which is just one more (and slightly error-prone) step.
(Note that my OOo settings have curly apostrophes set as standard.)
While single quotation marks are vertical, Zotero uses curly double quotation marks, for instance with article titles in the bibliography. Thus I end up with a mixed typographical output, like in this example:
Flam, Helena. 1990a. “Emotional 'Man': I. The Emotional 'Man' and the Problem of Collective Action.” International Sociology 5:39-56.
When double quotation marks are part of the title/database entry, they are also rendered vertical in the output, for example:
Flam, H., 2000. The emotional "man" and the problem of collective action, Frankfurt am Main [u.a.]: Lang.
This is independent of the style I use (e.g. ASA, APSA, Chicago, Harvard...)
But if this is a style problem, how can I adjust the style?
I'm using OOo 3.0.1, Zotero 1.5b2, Firefox 3.0.8. Windows XP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_marks#Typing_quotation_marks_from_a_computer_keyboard Some word processors have smart quotes to replace those as you type them. The feature does not apply to auto-inserted text or to other programs. This is because the style file uses curly quotes to embrace the title, but your database entry has typewriter quotes. This is because your database entry uses typewriter quotes. Yhe ones you report aren't style problems. But you can refer to:
http://www.zotero.org/support/dev/creating_citation_styles
I understand this may not be trivial to do, but couldn't Zotero be sensitive to document/wordprocessor settings?
I guess, this doesn't make it userfriendly in absolute terms. And like I said, it wouldn't really solve the problem in the context of divergent formatting requirements. The AutoFormat solution seems equally cumbersome. I have just tried it and it changed a whole bulk of format settings, most of which I didn't want, creating only more work. Maybe there is a workaround to that too, changing a list of settings (and changing them back for the next document etc). But really, all I wanted to flag is: in a more userfriendly environment I wouldn't have to worry about all of this and that this maybe worthwhile taking into consideration as Zotero could save me some work by being more sensitive to the document settings if that is somehow possible.
Chicago describes unidirectional marks as inferior, see: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/SpecialCharacters/SpecialCharacters10.html
Again, my point about user friendlyness is that users shouldn't have to adjust elaborate settings/lists in their word processor or download extra plugins for an issue like this. It should be enough to tell OOo once how to handle apostrophes (which works fine apart from Zotero insertions) and not worry about it anymore. I really don't know any other way to get this accross in a more intelligible way.
If this is to be resolved by CSL or through the OOo-plugin doesn't really matter to me, as long as it is adjustable both ways and I don't get mixed results.
I agree that CSL implementations probably ought by default or by configuration do the right typographic thing with quotes. But as noksagt says, it might not be that straightforward.
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/4543/
and:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/2387/ I've had submissions where I've been told to cite both title and author lists exactly as they appear in print. This mixes author names/abbreviations, different casting of titles, etc. I don't think anyone is really disagreeing with you. But there is no clear "right way" to "fix" this and it isn't even clear to me who should be worrying about the fix (OO.o, Zotero, CSL).
Note that rewriting fields applies to more than just quotation marks:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/5875/
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/5915/
Is this something to be applied with a single citation style or only some documents?
Also, the "problem" is not Zotero-specific. Try copy/pasting your post containing both curly and straight quotes into OO.o writer; none of the marks will be reformatted. Is it "user friendly" for pasted text to act different than Zotero-inserted text?
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/04/02/typography-keyboard-layout-download-now/
(at least for my field)
As to how, at what level, by whom this should be fixed, I'm afraid I can't be of much help. Like I said before, I understand this may not be trivial. My intention was to provide input from the perspective of user experience and I'm still covinced that the mixed output I get now is problematic under typographic considerations. But I have to leave it to others to determine the consequences.