Upgrade StorageProblem with zotero/juris-m styles
Hello,
I'm not sure this is the right place for my question but I couldn't find another discussion on my issue.
The problem is that last week I was using juris-m on one computer and I was very satisfied of the results. I was citing a Eropean union documents and it was great.
Yesterday I tried to install juris-m on another computer and when I used the same style and the same citation the result was completely different.
Example:
The first time, using Chicago manual (full note) the citation looked something like this: 85/8EEC: Council Decision of.....
Yesterday the same citation looked like this: Council Decision 85/8/EEC.
Another ptoblem was with the Official Journal name.
Both the times it was entered as "OJ L2/24". The first time juris-m turned it into the full name "Official Journal L..." and the second time it appeared as I entered it "OJ L..."
I think that the problem may be so ething with the abbrev.filter but I am not sure.
Again: I didn't change the bibliographic discription and used the same citation style both times.
Any idea?
I'm not sure this is the right place for my question but I couldn't find another discussion on my issue.
The problem is that last week I was using juris-m on one computer and I was very satisfied of the results. I was citing a Eropean union documents and it was great.
Yesterday I tried to install juris-m on another computer and when I used the same style and the same citation the result was completely different.
Example:
The first time, using Chicago manual (full note) the citation looked something like this: 85/8EEC: Council Decision of.....
Yesterday the same citation looked like this: Council Decision 85/8/EEC.
Another ptoblem was with the Official Journal name.
Both the times it was entered as "OJ L2/24". The first time juris-m turned it into the full name "Official Journal L..." and the second time it appeared as I entered it "OJ L..."
I think that the problem may be so ething with the abbrev.filter but I am not sure.
Again: I didn't change the bibliographic discription and used the same citation style both times.
Any idea?
-
fbennettLet's look at this closely. I'll send a separate forum message with my email. If you can send the exported data, we can tune up the styles to produce the correct result.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.