Auto-import of references from an article
Hello,
Here is my dream: I am reading a paper online, somewhere, and I see a reference in that paper I would like in my library. I then just drag that tagged element onto a collection in zotero, and zotero adds it.
That's not happening, of course, but zotero seems to be the closest on the PC to it. Here's my question: is there any site (such as sciencedirect) where zotero knows how to recognize the cited references in a paper? That is, where a yellow "folder" appears in the address bar above when you're reading a paper, so that you can automatically import some of the references from that paper into zotero?
Would it be cool if there was some sort of standard, and perhaps an activex control, or some plugin, which would allow dragging-and-dropping of these references?
thanks,
allie
Here is my dream: I am reading a paper online, somewhere, and I see a reference in that paper I would like in my library. I then just drag that tagged element onto a collection in zotero, and zotero adds it.
That's not happening, of course, but zotero seems to be the closest on the PC to it. Here's my question: is there any site (such as sciencedirect) where zotero knows how to recognize the cited references in a paper? That is, where a yellow "folder" appears in the address bar above when you're reading a paper, so that you can automatically import some of the references from that paper into zotero?
Would it be cool if there was some sort of standard, and perhaps an activex control, or some plugin, which would allow dragging-and-dropping of these references?
thanks,
allie
Now, if people start embedding metadata inside those citations, say using COinS, then Zotero would automatically generate a folder icon and list the items on that page in the order they appear.
Re: the plain text issue, that is true, but it's also true for things such as google scholar, right? Yet, zotero has site-parsers which pick apart the html/plain text in google scholar and web of science and a bunch of other sites based on knowledge of how each site displays the references. I don't know why such a solution, while not as nice as a standards-metadata-based solution, couldn't work for the bibliography in a particular database such as sciencedirect as well. The only difference would be parsing a list of references resulting from a search, versus parsing a list of references at the end of an article in the bibliography. (I am assuming that sciencedirect, for example, displays references for all the articles it contains in a standard way. Please let me know if that assumption is wrong).
thanks,
allie
Someone could always try writing a translator for the ScienceDirect references page, but it'd make more sense for them to add COinS to those references.
if you click on "references" for a paper in web of science, it comes up with a list which is more structured than the bibs in sciencedirect. That might be a better opportunity to parse bibliographies.
COinS, i'm sure, would be much better. But that's not exactly under our control, unfortunately.
So, am I to take it then that no sites have bibliographies of papers parsable by zotero?
thanks,
allie
The reason being that it uses a format called Wikipedia Citation Templates, rather than straight-up plain text or HTML, that makes it easy to ingest the information. Each piece of information is stored in a separate field, so no semantic parsing is necessary. If you look in the article source toward the end you can see what I mean.
That's not particularly useful for serious scholarly study, of course.
For example, if you search for 'rare species' you get a short bibliography. The article listed may be of interest and a translator valuable in acquiring it in your collection.
Thanks,
Teresa