Check for identical author/editor
Maybe I missed something, but is there a way to check whether contributors – for example, author and editor – are identical? In my field, bibliographies like this are quite common:
Doe, John (1998): Article. In: Idem (ed).: Book.
To do this I need the possibilty to check whether two variables are identical, and I don't know whether this is actually implemented.
simon
Doe, John (1998): Article. In: Idem (ed).: Book.
To do this I need the possibilty to check whether two variables are identical, and I don't know whether this is actually implemented.
simon
In this thread, MHSmith wrote: ATM, the only workaround I see is to add "Id." as book author (or editor, etc.) in zotero.
And the workaround for the first problem mentioned by MHSmith is to use "suppress author" and manually edit the citation.
Any idea?
Comparing whether two variables have the same content is probably more acceptable. I'm not sure if there are any more elegant ways to do this, but one could imagine a simple conditional like:
<choose>
<if same-variable-value="author editor">
...
</if>
</choose>
More seriously - as a technical issue this doesn't seem too problematic - we're already checking for same authors in various ways for disambiguation and for author-substitute.
The question is how/whethter to implement that on the CSL side - we would probably need some use cases. I believe idem doesn't just exists within one citation, but also, in some styles between two citations, as in:
Thomas Mann, Der Zauberberg, 457.
Idem, Die Buddenbrooks, 710.
IIRC the term is also localized - e.g. in German it's ders./dies. (derselbe, dieselben - might be dieselbe for female authors...)
And I know Bruce doesn't like Idem (and I agree too).
Anyway, there are two different issues as it appears in MHSmith post I quoted above. What's common to both is that Idem replace the author name.
1) "Idem" in the same citation: 2) "Idem" in two subsequent citations (same author, different books): E.g.:
www.univ-paris1.fr/fileadmin/Publi_Sorbonne/Recommandations_aux_auteurs.pdf
http://www.mus.ulaval.ca/roberge/gdrm/07-notes.htm
http://66.46.185.79/bdl/gabarit_bdl.asp?id=3320
http://e-spania.revues.org/2403?&id=2403
I am currently in charge of two different styles, and both require this: substituting "Id." instead of the second author's name when two citations follow each other within the same footnote by the same author.
Edit Feb. 2013: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/27564/
(1) Whether "id." would apply to items with multiple names;
(2) If (1), then whether "id.":
--(a) should be triggered only by a full match of all names, or
--(b) should apply to names at matching positions, or
--(c) either, depending on the style;
(3) If (2)(a), then whether names behind et al. should affect the match;
(4) Whether "id." would be available in styles that perform by-cite disambiguation by expanding given names; and
(5) If (4), whether expanded name forms affecting a name replaced by "id." should be reflected in the preceding partner.
Implementation and testing could get pretty tricky, depending on how much of that is put into the specification.
1) yes
2) a)
3) yes
@zuphilip - what do you think?
4 and 5 I don't follow--do you have an example for me?
(and a new term "idem" will have to be added to the existing list)
The terms in German would be "Ders. = Derselbe" for idem, "Dies. = Diesselbe" for eadem and sometimes "Dies. = Dieselben" for multiple authors, cf. here page 6. Do we have the information about the gender of the author in CSL?
Some other observations from the same style guide:
It is possible that idem is replacing only part of the authorship, e.g. p. 9 (but not on page 8):
Larenz, Karl, Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. 1: Allgemeiner Teil, 14. Aufl., München 1987; Bd. 2: Besonderer Teil, 1. Halbband, 13. Aufl., München 1986 [zitiert: Larenz, SchuldR AT bzw. BT 1].
Ders./Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. 2: Besonderer Teil, 2. Halbband, 13. Aufl., München 1994
It is possible that idem is occuring in combination with et-al, e.g. p. 21:
Schoch, in: ders. u.a., VwGO, § 80 [Stand: 2/1998] Rn. 26
Moreover, this style guide writes that the "Ders./Dies." should be given grammatically correct, i.e. it sometimes changes to "dens. = denselben", e.g. p. 22
Vgl. von Mutius, Jura 1984, 193 (195); dens., Jura 1988, 30 (31)
Larenz, Karl, Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. 1: Allgemeiner Teil, 14. Aufl., München 1987; Bd. 2: Besonderer Teil, 1. Halbband, 13. Aufl., München 1986 [zitiert: Larenz, SchuldR AT bzw. BT 1].
Ders./Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. 2: Besonderer Teil, 2. Halbband, 13. Aufl., München 1994
already via subsequent-author-substitute (though, of course, not gender correct).
We don't store information on the gender of the author (neither in Zotero nor in citeproc-JSON) and I don't think that'll be manageable, to be honest.
WRT the rest: oh my, what a mess...
(And it still that doesn't solve the problem entirely: we're left with both the grammatical issue raised by zuphilip and the problem of what to do with authors who have pronoun preferences from male/female).