APA and doi:
The doi is not correctly formatted when adding the bibliography.
My citation is: (Bokeno, 2011)
When I add the bibliography I get:
Bokeno, R. (2011). Putting people first. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 25(1), 25–27. http://doi.org/10.1108/14777281111096816
BUT the doi should not have http://doi.org...it SHOULD BE:
doi:10.1108/14777281111096816
Why is Zotero adding http://doi.org when it is not in the reference?
My citation is: (Bokeno, 2011)
When I add the bibliography I get:
Bokeno, R. (2011). Putting people first. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 25(1), 25–27. http://doi.org/10.1108/14777281111096816
BUT the doi should not have http://doi.org...it SHOULD BE:
doi:10.1108/14777281111096816
Why is Zotero adding http://doi.org when it is not in the reference?
However, I just found this blog which said things changed recently (as Adam has told us!) and that both formats are ok, as long as you consistently use one format or the other.... Here's the link:
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/digital-object-identifier-doi/
I would strongly recommend you not delete the http://doi.org/ part, as it makes using the DOI much easier for readers and is preferred by APA over the old format.
EDIT:
@zuphilip
I wonder whether the current APA 6 DOI handling should be also adopted for DGfP and ZfPäd?
If you have any (other) source for the journal (ZfPäd) requirements or any reliable words from the editors, we can consider to change the implementation.
I hope that professors and editors with particularly severe OCD will not penalize authors for using what is the current standard. Be prepared to convince them with evidence from APA. I personally know someone who requires students to use APA 5!
I'm making do with a find-and-replace function for now, but I'd like to get Zotero back to the old style of "doi:" just because it's still the convention.
https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/raw/2902d4412a1617322e3d08832683eb703928db5a/apa.csl
you'll want to change the id to prevent if from being constantly overwritten on updates.
I think distinguishing between a standard and the "convention" around its adaptation is a terrible idea, but oh well.