Upgrade Storage√ [MLZ] Tying different entries of "identical" item?
It is expected that you enter multiple iterations of the same reference if you want to cite multiple publications of the same authority - e.g., a court judgment in different reports. (MLZ will recognize it's the same judgment and will nicely collapse them in citation.)
Another situation where I need to enter multiple iterations of the same reference is a foreign publication - one in the original foreign language and one in English. I can choose either depending on the journal I'm targeting.
In either case, it'd be nice if there was a way to tell MLZ that these are simply different iterations of the same reference. (In the former situation, MLZ recognizes and collapses them in citation, but MLZ can't in the latter, since the two entries look different.) It'd be even nicer if there was a button/tab which will quickly take you to other iterations of the same reference. (I guess you can use the "related" tab in that fashion, but it will conflate "related" items and "identical" items.)
Another situation where I need to enter multiple iterations of the same reference is a foreign publication - one in the original foreign language and one in English. I can choose either depending on the journal I'm targeting.
In either case, it'd be nice if there was a way to tell MLZ that these are simply different iterations of the same reference. (In the former situation, MLZ recognizes and collapses them in citation, but MLZ can't in the latter, since the two entries look different.) It'd be even nicer if there was a button/tab which will quickly take you to other iterations of the same reference. (I guess you can use the "related" tab in that fashion, but it will conflate "related" items and "identical" items.)
Jung Kew Sun, The Effect of Tax Avoidance Behavior on Capital Structure, Korea International Accounting Review, Vol. 51, 2013, 10: 47-74.
선정규, 조세회피행위가 자본구조에 미치는 영향, 국제회계연구 제51집, 2013년 10월: 47-74.
These are citations of the same journal article, just in different languages. I'd use the first citation in an English-language article, and the second one in a Korean-language article.