[citeproc bug] misterious et-al behavior

adamsmith
See the sample data and style (at the bottom) here:
https://gist.github.com/adam3smith/7514973

As you can see, the style shouldn't have any et-al in the bibliography - it's not set at cs:style, not in cs:bibliography, and note in cs:author

Yet, we see et al after 6 names - suggesting there is something like an et-al-min="8" et-al-use-first="6" (or so) set somewhere, somehow... that's not good.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.