[mlz] Some peculiarities in mlz-amlaw.csl
Hi,
As I continue to work on my "MLZ Taiwan Law Style", I've run into some peculiarities in mlz-amlw.csl on which I hope someone could shed some light. Thanks.
1. "The New York Times" is abbreviated as "The N.Y. Times" (after importing both the Abbr and Hints lists). Shouldn't the leading "the" be omitted? Is there a way to tell the style processor to omit all leading "the"?
2. "September" is abbreviated as "Sep.", not "Sept." I thought the latter is more common, wrong?
3. The "medium" field for an interview is not properly handled (doesn't show up in citation). Upon closer look, I guess the following block of code is the culprit (line 494-96):
<if match="all" variable="genre interviewer">
<text text-case="title" variable="genre"/>
</if>
I guess the two instances of "genre" should be changed to "medium".
4. Inside the associated abbreviation list (mlz-amlaw-names.json), there are two sections with entries for abbreviated US federal circuit court names: "us - institution-part" & "us;federal - institution-part". The entries are not identical, however. Under "us - institution-part", we have:
"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit": "8th Cir.",
"Second Circuit Court of Appeals": "2d Cir.",
Under "us;federal - institution-part", there are:
"Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals": "8th Cir.",
"Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals": "11th Cir.",
"Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals": "5th Cir.",
"First Circuit Court of Appeals": "1st Cir.",
"Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals": "4th Cir.",
"Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals": "9th Cir.",
"Second Circuit Court of Appeals": "2nd Cir.",
"Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals": "7th Cir.",
"Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals": "6th Cir.",
"Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals": "10th Cir.",
"Third Circuit Court of Appeals": "3rd Cir."
Neither has the full list, and the abbreviations for the 2nd circuit are different. There is also an entry for district courts under "us;federal - institution-part":
"District Court": "!here>>>",
which I don't quite understand.
I've amended both with a complete list of all federal circuit courts with numerous common variations, but I don't know how to contribute the amendments back.
5. mlz-amlaw.csl omits the "XML declaration" at the start of the file. Is that intentional? That doesn't prevent it from working properly, but my editor (Sublime Text) doesn't color code the file without the line.
As I continue to work on my "MLZ Taiwan Law Style", I've run into some peculiarities in mlz-amlw.csl on which I hope someone could shed some light. Thanks.
1. "The New York Times" is abbreviated as "The N.Y. Times" (after importing both the Abbr and Hints lists). Shouldn't the leading "the" be omitted? Is there a way to tell the style processor to omit all leading "the"?
2. "September" is abbreviated as "Sep.", not "Sept." I thought the latter is more common, wrong?
3. The "medium" field for an interview is not properly handled (doesn't show up in citation). Upon closer look, I guess the following block of code is the culprit (line 494-96):
<if match="all" variable="genre interviewer">
<text text-case="title" variable="genre"/>
</if>
I guess the two instances of "genre" should be changed to "medium".
4. Inside the associated abbreviation list (mlz-amlaw-names.json), there are two sections with entries for abbreviated US federal circuit court names: "us - institution-part" & "us;federal - institution-part". The entries are not identical, however. Under "us - institution-part", we have:
"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit": "8th Cir.",
"Second Circuit Court of Appeals": "2d Cir.",
Under "us;federal - institution-part", there are:
"Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals": "8th Cir.",
"Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals": "11th Cir.",
"Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals": "5th Cir.",
"First Circuit Court of Appeals": "1st Cir.",
"Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals": "4th Cir.",
"Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals": "9th Cir.",
"Second Circuit Court of Appeals": "2nd Cir.",
"Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals": "7th Cir.",
"Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals": "6th Cir.",
"Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals": "10th Cir.",
"Third Circuit Court of Appeals": "3rd Cir."
Neither has the full list, and the abbreviations for the 2nd circuit are different. There is also an entry for district courts under "us;federal - institution-part":
"District Court": "!here>>>",
which I don't quite understand.
I've amended both with a complete list of all federal circuit courts with numerous common variations, but I don't know how to contribute the amendments back.
5. mlz-amlaw.csl omits the "XML declaration" at the start of the file. Is that intentional? That doesn't prevent it from working properly, but my editor (Sublime Text) doesn't color code the file without the line.
The list of jurisdiction codes is nowhere complete yet, but if there is anything you'd like to see added (for the US, Taiwan, or any other jurisdiction), just let me know. The list is in a GitHub repo, feel free to fork it and submit pull requests. Any additions will feed through on the next MLZ release.
Thanks for the other comments. I'll have to learn how to work with Github some other day.
In bibliography, many items are now missing their title. I guess (without getting to the bottom of it) it's because the new "amlaw-title" macro test for a cite's position extensively.
Two other things I forgot to mention that's still there with the newest version: newspaper articles are rendered with common phrases in their title abbreviated and jurisdiction parenthesis behind dates, set off with a comma. Are they intended behavior? See, e.g. (emphasis added):
Richard H. Thaler, Fin. Literacy, Beyond the Classroom, The N.Y. Times, Oct. 5, 2013, (U.S.), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/business/financial-literacy-beyond-the-classroom.html.
I'm asking because they are different from Bluebook rules, but I know mlz-amlw follows Wisconsin Court of Appeals rules, not the bluebook, so perhaps they are intended.
Saw the new "condition(s)" elements inside "if/else-if/else", by the way. Great additions! Thanks!
Can you export a few records that come up without titles in the bib, and save them as a public gist on http://gist.github.com? If you post the gist URL back here, I'll take a look.
http://citationstyles.org/downloads/specification.html#choose
With the cause known, fixing up the style will be straightforward. Thanks for raising a flag on this.
The Jurisdiction value on Newspaper Article is for cases reported in newspapers. (For the new Japanese legal style, I added the field to Journal Article yesterday as well, for case comments.)