Abstract from WoS in BibTex

I have searched help & forums but a simple Q: I export (save) Web of Science (WoS/WoK) papers + abstract as BibTex (I am on PC & use MS Word). I then Import the *.bib into Zotero & usually works fine except abstracts never available. Have checked simple "Plain txt" export option in WoS & files hold abstract. What am I doing wrong?? I have now imported 1000+ refs & know I am going to regret not having abstracts very soon!! An idiot-proof reply would be appreciated. Zotero is FANTASTIC (I am shouting) Cheers R
  • Could you post one of the BibTeX files?
  • Hi aurimas - unclear how to attach a file within the forum (& I can't open the bibtex file & simply paste it in). Thanks Richard
  • BibTeX files are simple text files. You can open them in any text editor (e.g. WordPad in Windows)
  • OK - now you know why I asked for idiot-proof!! Actually, I am in process of "accidentally" deleting all my refs - was trying t clean up my files when it went pear shaped. Will be back with you in 30 mins. R
  • Actually - found one quickly - pasted below

    @article{ ISI:000297154900019,
    Author = {Aplin, Ken P. and Suzuki, Hitoshi and Chinen, Alejandro A. and Chesser,
    R. Terry and ten Have, Jose and Donnellan, Stephen C. and Austin, Jeremy
    and Frost, Angela and Gonzalez, Jean Paul and Herbreteau, Vincent and
    Catzeflis, Francois and Soubrier, Julien and Fang, Yin-Ping and Robins,
    Judith and Matisoo-Smith, Elizabeth and Bastos, Amanda D. S. and
    Maryanto, Ibnu and Sinaga, Martua H. and Denys, Christiane and Van den
    Bussche, Ronald A. and Conroy, Chris and Rowe, Kevin and Cooper, Alan},
    Title = {{Multiple Geographic Origins of Commensalism and Complex Dispersal
    History of Black Rats}},
    Journal = {{PLOS ONE}},
    Year = {{2011}},
    Volume = {{6}},
    Number = {{11}},
    Month = {{NOV 2}},
    Abstract = {{The Black Rat (Rattus rattus) spread out of Asia to become one of the
    world's worst agricultural and urban pests, and a reservoir or vector of
    numerous zoonotic diseases, including the devastating plague. Despite
    the global scale and inestimable cost of their impacts on both human
    livelihoods and natural ecosystems, little is known of the global
    genetic diversity of Black Rats, the timing and directions of their
    historical dispersals, and the risks associated with contemporary
    movements. We surveyed mitochondrial DNA of Black Rats collected across
    their global range as a first step towards obtaining an historical
    genetic perspective on this socioeconomically important group of
    rodents. We found a strong phylogeographic pattern with
    well-differentiated lineages of Black Rats native to South Asia, the
    Himalayan region, southern Indochina, and northern Indochina to East
    Asia, and a diversification that probably commenced in the early Middle
    Pleistocene. We also identified two other currently recognised species
    of Rattus as potential derivatives of a paraphyletic R. rattus. Three of
    the four phylogenetic lineage units within R. rattus show clear genetic
    signatures of major population expansion in prehistoric times, and the
    distribution of particular haplogroups mirrors archaeologically and
    historically documented patterns of human dispersal and trade.
    Commensalism clearly arose multiple times in R. rattus and in widely
    separated geographic regions, and this may account for apparent
    regionalism in their associated pathogens. Our findings represent an
    important step towards deeper understanding the complex and influential
    relationship that has developed between Black Rats and humans, and
    invite a thorough re-examination of host-pathogen associations among
    Black Rats.}},
    DOI = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0026357}},
    Article-Number = {{e26357}},
    ISSN = {{1932-6203}},
    ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Bastos, Armanda/B-6357-2009
    Austin, Jeremy/F-8729-2010
    Cooper, Alan/E-8171-2012
    Suzuki, Hitoshi/F-8539-2012
    Donnellan, Stephen/F-2442-2013}},
    ORCID-Numbers = {{Cooper, Alan/0000-0002-7738-7851
    Donnellan, Stephen/0000-0002-5448-3226}},
    Unique-ID = {{ISI:000297154900019}},
    }

    @article{ ISI:000296923700004,
    Author = {Brown, Heidi E. and Levy, Craig E. and Enscore, Russell E. and
    Schriefer, Martin E. and DeLiberto, Thomas J. and Gage, Kenneth L. and
    Eisen, Rebecca J.},
    Title = {{Annual Seroprevalence of Yersinia pestis in Coyotes as Predictors of
    Interannual Variation in Reports of Human Plague Cases in Arizona,
    United States}},
    Journal = {{VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES}},
    Year = {{2011}},
    Volume = {{11}},
    Number = {{11}},
    Pages = {{1439-1446}},
    Month = {{NOV}},
    Abstract = {{Although several health departments collect coyote blood samples for
    plague surveillance, the association between reported human cases and
    coyote seroprevalence rates remains anecdotal. Using data from an
    endemic region of the United States, we sought to quantify this
    association. From 1974 to 1998, about 2,276 coyote blood samples from
    four Arizona counties were tested for serological evidence of exposure
    to Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague. Using a titer
    threshold presumed to be indicative of recent infection (serum titers of
    >= 1:256), we found a statistically significant relationship between
    years with >17\% sero-positive coyotes and years with two or more human
    cases reported. Moreover, when the annual coyote seroprevalence rates
    were dichotomized at 17\%, 84\% of the years were correctly classified
    using four biologically relevant meteorological variables in a linear
    regression. This is the first time a statistically significant temporal
    association between human plague cases and coyote seroprevalence rates
    has been shown. However, issues with data resolution and surveillance
    effort that potentially limit the public health utility of using coyote
    seroprevalence rates are discussed.}},
    DOI = {{10.1089/vbz.2010.0196}},
    ISSN = {{1530-3667}},
    Unique-ID = {{ISI:000296923700004}},
    }
  • edited July 11, 2013
    Couple things:
    1) Why don't you use the URL bar icon to import from WoS? It will generally result in cleaner imports and less hassle.

    2)
    I then Import the *.bib into Zotero & usually works fine except abstracts never available.
    How exactly are you importing these downloaded files?
    As you can see, the BibTeX contains the abstract. If you copy the BibTeX that you pasted, go to Zotero, and use the Gear menu -> Import from Clipboard (not that this should be your workflow, it's just for troubleshooting purposes), the abstract should be imported. If it's not, then see http://www.zotero.org/support/troubleshooting_translator_issues steps 2, 3, 5
  • Not my evening - I have just finished replying to you, but thought i would look at URL bar link in your reply before posting - needless to say my reply has disappeared - as have all my entries in my Zotero subfolders - they (the citations & linked pdfs) are sitting my my junk folder laughing at me ... Oh well - I am spending much of tomorrow sitting in airports - so guess what I will be doing!

    I used File -> Import -> *.bib & bugger me - for reasons unknown the abstracts are now sitting in the right hand column!! Yet I have done this same sequence on 50 odd *.bib files over the past few days - no idea at all.

    But many thanks for your time & advice, & should this quirk come back to haunt me, I have your suggestions above to follow. Ditto I will try the URL bar AFTER I have posted this :) Much appreciated - Best Richard
Sign In or Register to comment.