[Solved-Mostly] The Vancouver Styles are not correct according to my College guidelines
I tried zotero about 3 years ago and couldn't get it to work properly. Today I installed again and it just works. I'm using http://www.zotero.org/styles/vancouver-brackets It is not quite right but I can save myself sooo much time. Thanks Guys!
The Vancouver Styles are not correct according to my College guidelines(Paramount College of Natural Medicine)
They say they use Vancouver but it appears a little different to all 13 current Vancouver styles you have so far.
They want it like this:
"#. Author of article AA, Author of article BB, Author of article CC. Title of article.
Abbreviated Title of Journal. year; vol(issue):page number(s)."
"#. Author A, Author B. Title of article. Abbreviated Title of Journal [format]. year
[cited year abbreviated month day];vol(no):page numbers[estimated if
necessary]. Available from: Database Name (if appropriate). URL."
"#. Author A, Author B. Document title. Webpage name [format].
Source/production information; Date of internet publication [cited year month
day]. Available from: URL."
So for examples we have:
1. Gillespie NC, Lewis RJ, Pearn JH, Bourke ATC, Holmes MJ, Bourke JB, et al. Ciguatera in Australia: occurrence, clinical features, pathophysiology and management. Med J Aust. 1986;145:584-90.
2. Leroy EM, Telfer P, Kumulungui B, Yaba P, et al. A serological survey of Ebola virus infection in central African nonhuman primates. J Infect Dis [abstract]. 2004 [cited 2005 Jun 30];190(11):1895. Available from: ProQuest. http://www.umi.com/proquest/.
3. Australian Insitute of Health and Welfare. Chronic diseases and associated risk factors [document on the Internet]. Canberra: The Institute; 2004 [updated 2005 June 23; cited 2005 Jun 30]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/cdarf/index.cfm.
In the body the citations should be in brackets i.e.
Ebola is a non human virus(2).
I've looked at the csl files and tried to figure out how to change it myself but it's too big a learning curve right now.
Could someone please create a csl file that matches the above.
Thanks
herbgeek
The Vancouver Styles are not correct according to my College guidelines(Paramount College of Natural Medicine)
They say they use Vancouver but it appears a little different to all 13 current Vancouver styles you have so far.
They want it like this:
"#. Author of article AA, Author of article BB, Author of article CC. Title of article.
Abbreviated Title of Journal. year; vol(issue):page number(s)."
"#. Author A, Author B. Title of article. Abbreviated Title of Journal [format]. year
[cited year abbreviated month day];vol(no):page numbers[estimated if
necessary]. Available from: Database Name (if appropriate). URL."
"#. Author A, Author B. Document title. Webpage name [format].
Source/production information; Date of internet publication [cited year month
day]. Available from: URL."
So for examples we have:
1. Gillespie NC, Lewis RJ, Pearn JH, Bourke ATC, Holmes MJ, Bourke JB, et al. Ciguatera in Australia: occurrence, clinical features, pathophysiology and management. Med J Aust. 1986;145:584-90.
2. Leroy EM, Telfer P, Kumulungui B, Yaba P, et al. A serological survey of Ebola virus infection in central African nonhuman primates. J Infect Dis [abstract]. 2004 [cited 2005 Jun 30];190(11):1895. Available from: ProQuest. http://www.umi.com/proquest/.
3. Australian Insitute of Health and Welfare. Chronic diseases and associated risk factors [document on the Internet]. Canberra: The Institute; 2004 [updated 2005 June 23; cited 2005 Jun 30]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/cdarf/index.cfm.
In the body the citations should be in brackets i.e.
Ebola is a non human virus(2).
I've looked at the csl files and tried to figure out how to change it myself but it's too big a learning curve right now.
Could someone please create a csl file that matches the above.
Thanks
herbgeek
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html
it's just not possible to add CSL styles for individual universities (unless someone from that institution supplies the style).
I don't see much in terms of differences to Vancouver, though?
I'm considering a study on individual university citation styles. As @adamsmith has said, there are too many of them. I suspect that I will have trouble if I try to find out _why_ the specialized style exists with only very minor differences from a "standard" style. I suspect that no one knows with certainty. This strikes me as a kind of institutional passive-aggressive conduct. Simply tallying the number of institutions with unique styles would be tedious but simple to do. What would be interesting is understanding why.
Having a unique style may not be so bad for long-term faculty but new faculty will need to learn a style that is useless for preparing manuscripts for publication. Even long-term faculty will always need to use a different style when they write for external publications or when they collaborate with authors at another institution. Why force students to use a style that will be useless after they graduate? The inconvenience is quite a price to pay for whatever notion that led someone to develop a unique citation style.
(This is not a reference to personal experience, of course, and any resemblance to events real or imagined is purely coincidental.)
"At PCNM, we use the Vancouver style of referencing system. The Vancouver style was first defined by a meeting of medical journal editors in Vancouver, Canada, in 1978.
These guidelines follow the principles given in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication published by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) in 2004 and the American Medical Association Manual of Style, 9th edition, 1998. These publications constitute authoritative international guides to Vancouver publication standards and style."
so maybe it's just an old version of Vancouver.
We will see what happens with my next paper.
@fbennett "purely coincidental...."
Really?
My poking and prodding, with your help (both in this thread and with your 13 Vancouver styles), seems to have caused them to look at their style and they plan to release a new set of guidelines soon!
I've got a preview copy and some of the differences are gone.
[document on the Internet] becomes [Internet]
Long date is now acceptable
DOI is now included if available
No longer have to crop after 6 authors and use et.al. except in the text
Citations in the text have to be in round brackets(1) still :-(
Thanks Guys
http://www.icmje.org/manuscript_1prepare.html The ICMJE refers users to the NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, 2nd edition at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7256/?amp=&depth=2
Look at the Zotero NLM styles. One of them is likely to closely match what you need.
http://www.zotero.org/styles
See also:
http://editor.citationstyles.org/searchByName/
That was easy!
I thought I had to do it in the csl text files hence the request for someone else to do it (too big a learning curve)
Now just hope it works and if it doesn't I know how to fix it.