Two requests
I don't know if this was covered before but it would be great if:
- Zotero could import stuff from Silver-Platter
- there was a document style for standards.
Thanks!
- Zotero could import stuff from Silver-Platter
- there was a document style for standards.
Thanks!
JabRef is free/open source and cross platform. It can import the format & then export to formats that Zotero can then import.
In case someone has some other format that would need an intermediate step,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_reference_management_software
lists import & export formats.
I generally agree with your belief in very strong generic types, but the "document" type in zotero really isn't rich enough to be a catch-all at this time.
These are very important for people in engineering disciplines. They are generally similar to the "Statute" type. Generally there is a standards organization--ANSI, ISO, ASTM, IEEE, and so on--and a number. Often there are two; a national or trade organization that writes the standard and assigns its number (ASTM, IEEE, IESNA, IETF, etc.) and an umbrella national or international organization which assigns a different number gives the standard regulatory force (ISO, ANSI, DIN, JIS, CCITT, etc.)
There is usually a collective author, that is often a designated committee: IEEE 802 Committee, or a subgroup: IEEE 802.14 working group.
Standards in progress sometimes have different designations than finished standards; sometimes they only have names, rather than numbers.
Sample citation formats can be found in the following stylebooks:
ASTM: http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/Blue_Book.pdf
See section G22
IEEE: http://standards.ieee.org/guides/style/2009_Style_Manual.pdf
See section 19.2
The "document" type doesn't provide enough structured information for generation of a bibliographic entry.
If implemented, I think that this new item/document type would be very useful.
Please developers, hear our prayers! ;P
1. I do import the rfc.bib into Zotero. The RFCs become Book entries. The needed part is in the field "extra". The Book entry contains also series and serie number which are filled in by the RFC number and "Request For Comments" text.
2. I reference the RFCs in the text
3. The RFC number does not show in the bibliography as no style includes the field "extra", or "Series", or "Series Number".
How can I create my own style that will fix this?!
i would just emphasize the need for a standard type…
Since we have already a type for patents, i really don't see any reason why not have a type for standards…
There are numerous organizations that publish standards, some of them are mentioned here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standards_organization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Standards_organizations
These are organizations that do mainly standards, but on the other hand, every bigger company does publish standards, like general electric, siemens, vw, etc…
There are also people who rely on them more or less, like people in government bureaus and similar organizations but also engineers in the commercial technology fields. Just recently someone of a federal bureau for occupational safety asked me where the standards type wood be… well i could only write him that there is none, and point to some workarounds…
Additionally, collecting the standards all under the hood of the document item type really makes things intransparent. And depending on how you do it, you may need special citation styles. That makes it incompatible when you want to share with others who have used another workaround…..
Maybe we could take the patent type as a start for the standards type since it is quite similar…
i try to get started with basic fields here, patent type on the left , standard type on the right.
Feel free to comment / suggest etc…
*title = title
*inventor/attorney/agent/contributor = usually there is none since standards are issued by groups. But there can be one or more responsible persons - although one wouldn't list them in a bibliography.
*Abstract = Abstract
*Place = Place
*Country = Country
*Assignee =
*Issuing Authority = Issuing Authority (full name)
*Patent Number = Standards Number
*Filing Date =
*Pages = Pages
*Application number =
*Priority Numbers =
*Issue Date = Issue Date
*References = ?? References, could include superseded standards, but that's optional, i would say.
*Legal Status =
*Language = Language
*Short Title = Short Title
*URL, Accessed, Rights, Extra = "as usual"
Additional fields could be:
*type or genre: specification, test method, procedure, guide etc…
*Issuing Authority abbreviation: i.e.: EN, ISO, IEEE, DIN, ASME,
*Issuing Workgroup: for example NAFuO (that's from DIN EN ISO 11807-2)
*ICS class: for example 01.040.31; 31.260 - see for info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Classification_for_Standards
*part: lots of standards have more than one part - but mostly that is included/appended to the number, for example: ANSI ASME B1.20.1
Honestly, I don't have any idea how and where to map these fields… but I also don't know what fields get mapped where regarding the other item types that exist in zotero.
greetings
I do think that instrumental documents (regulations, orders, laws, as well as standards documents) are worth placing under discrete item types, both in Zotero and in CSL. In the case of documents of this kind, which are the result of a process, a dedicated type would convey important information about the document itself, which often cannot be easily inferred from the pattern of fields present in the item.
In other words, what mmoole said.
https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues?state=open
(for CSL)
Include info on needed fields and citation formats in a couple of relevant styles. Note that the general attitude toward adding item types is always conservative, so you may have to "defend" the item type somewhat, don't be discouraged by that. Also, with fbennett you have a powerful ally in your corner ;-)
Why does this issue need to be raised on two separate Github pages?
I have returned to Zotero after an absence of a few years since I found it so useful in the past. However, I am now using LaTeX rather than Word and will therefore be looking to export the library to BibteX, rather than use Zotero citation formats.
edit: the issue trackers are open - one general github account will do, I believe.
i created this as an entry on
https://github.com/ajlyon/zotero-bits/issues
also with a lin k to this topic here.
What I didnt find out was how to tag it for 'item-type' and 'CSL-change'...
greetings
##edit
well, here is the link: https://github.com/ajlyon/zotero-bits/issues/52