Chicago note vs. full note?
Is it just my system or does the citation for Chicago note look the same for Chicago full note?
Needless to say - it shouldn't. The Chicago note should not have the first name and publishing details beyond title and page, but it seems to do. Even Zotero say so here: http://www.zotero.org/support/kb/chicago_style_versions but what I get generated is not what the link says.
Anyone else has that problem?
Needless to say - it shouldn't. The Chicago note should not have the first name and publishing details beyond title and page, but it seems to do. Even Zotero say so here: http://www.zotero.org/support/kb/chicago_style_versions but what I get generated is not what the link says.
Anyone else has that problem?
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
i.e.
Skocpol, Theda. “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal.” Politics & Society 10, no. 2 (March 1, 1980): 155–201.
Those are the same for the two styles.
If you create a citation - using the word plugin or using quick-copy while pressing "shift" http://www.zotero.org/support/creating_bibliographies#quick_copy - this comes out right, i.e.
Theda Skocpol, “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal,” Politics & Society 10, no. 2 (March 1, 1980): 155–201, doi:10.1177/003232928001000202.
and
Skocpol, “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis.”