Error in Harvard Imperial College - Available from: blank
In bibliography generated with zotero using the Harvard Imperial College London style, 'Available from:' is blank, even where a url exists in the zotero item. When a DOI is present, that is used, but for websites, or articles without a DOI but with a url, the Available from: isn't displayed correctly.
Any idea how to fix this? I don't know much about the guts of zotero reference formats.
Example:
Has a url in item, but not given in bibliography:
Box, G.E.P. & Cox, D.R. (1964) An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 26 (2), 211–252. Available from: [Accessed: 24 August 2012].
Has a DOI and displays correctly:
Burgess, N.D., Hales, J.D., Ricketts, T.H. & Dinerstein, E. (2006) Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biological Conservation. [Online] 127 (4), 383–401. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.018 [Accessed: 28 August 2012].
Any idea how to fix this? I don't know much about the guts of zotero reference formats.
Example:
Has a url in item, but not given in bibliography:
Box, G.E.P. & Cox, D.R. (1964) An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 26 (2), 211–252. Available from: [Accessed: 24 August 2012].
Has a DOI and displays correctly:
Burgess, N.D., Hales, J.D., Ricketts, T.H. & Dinerstein, E. (2006) Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biological Conservation. [Online] 127 (4), 383–401. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.018 [Accessed: 28 August 2012].
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
even with the DOI that can't be right, though? The whole point of a doi is that you can do away with accessed dates etc.