Bibtex citation insertion style
Hello,
I am using the RTF Scan style in order to drag and drop citations into word processors that don't have a Zotero plugin, as discussed here:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/16592/citation-style-for-drag-and-drop-rtf-scan/
So I thought perhaps something similar could be useful for Latex and Bibtex. Some other people considered that modifying the Zotero code would be the way to go:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/146/2/integration-with-latex/
I have achieved more or less the same result with a CSL style based on the standard Bibtex CSL style at http://www.zotero.org/styles/bibtex , so I suppose this could be used by other tools that use CSL. I am far from a Latex/Bibtex expert so I do not know how useful that is. Does anybody care? Is it worth it to submit such a (very simple) style? I'd be happy to if anybody's interested.
I am using the RTF Scan style in order to drag and drop citations into word processors that don't have a Zotero plugin, as discussed here:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/16592/citation-style-for-drag-and-drop-rtf-scan/
So I thought perhaps something similar could be useful for Latex and Bibtex. Some other people considered that modifying the Zotero code would be the way to go:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/146/2/integration-with-latex/
I have achieved more or less the same result with a CSL style based on the standard Bibtex CSL style at http://www.zotero.org/styles/bibtex , so I suppose this could be used by other tools that use CSL. I am far from a Latex/Bibtex expert so I do not know how useful that is. Does anybody care? Is it worth it to submit such a (very simple) style? I'd be happy to if anybody's interested.
https://gist.github.com/3180534
This is my first submission, so I don't know what happens next. With a little bit of luck, interested people can already take a look at it?
\cite{noksagt-2012,aborel-2012}
instead of the current:\cite{noksagt-2012}
\cite{aborel-2012}
I actually hadn't noticed that feature (I should really read all text in dialog boxes, shouldn't I?)... thanks for pointing this out! Since it is so, I agree that merging this into the original BibTex style would be better.
> this modified style could theoretically use the compact cite form.
Weird, I thought I had taken care of that. Perhaps I haven't uploaded the latest version. I'll take a look at that and then I'll get in touch with the author of the original CSL to see if my modifications can make it into his code.