Cannot save anything from LexisNexis on Zotero 3.0 standalone
This is very odd. I cannot save anything from LexisNexis using Zotero 3.0 standalone. I am using Chrome (though the problem is the same in Firefox), and there are no buttons in the URL, and when I download a PDF of the article and try to retrieve the metadata, Zotero says there isn't. Does anyone know what's going on?
The problem is that Lexis doesn't provide any usable metadata to go by. I looked into writing a translator and I could make it work for my university's version of LexisNexis and the sources I use, but it was much too unstable for anything else.
I wonder why some libraries are recommending the download-to-PDF and then retrieve-metadata-from-PDF method when that doesn't work. I did get some meta data from a PDF I downloaded via Explorer, but it was the *wrong* data.
As a warning - it won't be very good - the data they supply is minimal.
That said:
1. Right now you can already import the Endnote output into Zotero. Save the RIS file that it will offer you and open it with Zotero.
Someone with more experience with Standalone than me should comment on the current workflow with this - with Zotero for FF it imports directly without any saving etc. in between.
2. If I saw this correctly, we may actually be able to write a translator for that. I'm not sure if the URL-structure across different LexisNexis versions is stable enough, but I'll give it a try at some point. That will take time, though, the site has everything to hate you can imagine.
1 of 367 DOCUMENTS
The Prague Post
April 3, 2013
The Mali dilemma
BYLINE: Prague Post staff
SECTION: NEWS
LENGTH: 1361 words
I'd give this a shot, but as you mention, the RIS export is very minimal and I'm not keen enough on law citations to be able to properly parse the metadata out of text (though I can see how that would be a fun thing to do for LexiNexis </sarcasm>)
(Sorry to be the bearer of a wet blanket on this, but I've just finished rereading some of the cases initiated by the Wexis twins, and they show a remarkable degree of creativity.)
Frank, do you happen to know of a non-(or minimally-)legalese literature on this? Or could we get anybody from LexisNexis into our discussion on this here - to tell us what can and what cannot be done, and to explain their reasoning?
But so Frank, do you think that something like I propose here: to download a set of newspaper articles as LexisNexis allows, to parse those in such a way that we can enter them in Zotero with the key fields in the proper place, to store them (temporarily) in the Zotero (sqlite) database on our hard drive, to then textmine them with a bunch of textmining tools (like papermachines), and to then analyze those results and use some visuals in published articles - might be illegal? How do we infringe on their rights (or on those of the original copyright holders) then? We're not just giving those articles away to third parties, we're not even storing them permanently (although even on that score - I still have filing cabinets full here at home with academic articles I used to copy in the 90s 'for fair use') - we're just analyzing them.
Your use is perfectly orthodox, it's just a matter of not getting incidentally squashed. Discretion is the better part of valour and all that.
I've posted that note (copy to you). We'll see that emerges.