Upgrade StorageMultilingual Zotero for "book section" item type
Hi I am using MLZ 3.0b3svn.
For the item type "journal" which contains the Multilingual field "title" (article title) and "publication" (journal title), MLZ does a great job to render citation with the original and the translation/transliteration. However, when I started to work with item type "book section" which contains "title" (this time means "chapter/article of an anthology, for instance") and "book title", MLZ did not give the translation/transliteration of the "book title".
I tried to edit the csl template, it seems that the csl has no control over translation/transliteration.
I wonder if other item type, say Newspaper, has the same problem too.
For the item type "journal" which contains the Multilingual field "title" (article title) and "publication" (journal title), MLZ does a great job to render citation with the original and the translation/transliteration. However, when I started to work with item type "book section" which contains "title" (this time means "chapter/article of an anthology, for instance") and "book title", MLZ did not give the translation/transliteration of the "book title".
I tried to edit the csl template, it seems that the csl has no control over translation/transliteration.
I wonder if other item type, say Newspaper, has the same problem too.
-
fbennettThanks for reporting this. There was a problem in the mapping of multilingual fields, which I've just fixed. If you update your client, the book title field should appear in citations now. If there were other fields that should have delivered multilingual content but failed to do so, they may also work now as well.
-
chauraphThanks for the troubleshooting. In fact, how could I update the client? I only know how to download the xpi from nagoya u's server.
-
adamsmiththe client updates automatically like all other FF add-ons. You can manually look for updates in the add-on tab.
-
chauraphThanks to the update, it works! I love MLZ!
-
fbennettGlad to hear that it worked!
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.