Upgrade StorageSmall error in citation style when using Ooo vs MS Word
When using a citation style with following code:
<term name="ordinal-01">ᵉ</term>
<term name="ordinal-02">ᵉ</term>
<term name="ordinal-03">ᵉ</term>
<term name="ordinal-04">ᵉ</term>
it works perfectly fine both in the Zotero Reference Test pane and (from reports I have had) with MS Word, but with Ooo (under Ubuntu 10.04) instead of getting, for instance, "2e" (with "e" in upper case), one gets "2?".
I fixed the bug by correcting the code as
<term name="ordinal-01">e</term>
<term name="ordinal-02">e</term>
<term name="ordinal-03">e</term>
<term name="ordinal-04">e</term>
but this is less correct ("e" is not in upper case any more). And anyway there seems to be a potential problem of compatibility between Ooo and Zotero here.
<term name="ordinal-01">ᵉ</term>
<term name="ordinal-02">ᵉ</term>
<term name="ordinal-03">ᵉ</term>
<term name="ordinal-04">ᵉ</term>
it works perfectly fine both in the Zotero Reference Test pane and (from reports I have had) with MS Word, but with Ooo (under Ubuntu 10.04) instead of getting, for instance, "2e" (with "e" in upper case), one gets "2?".
I fixed the bug by correcting the code as
<term name="ordinal-01">e</term>
<term name="ordinal-02">e</term>
<term name="ordinal-03">e</term>
<term name="ordinal-04">e</term>
but this is less correct ("e" is not in upper case any more). And anyway there seems to be a potential problem of compatibility between Ooo and Zotero here.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
https://gist.github.com/983548
edit: the formatting you're describing is superscript, not upper case.
Unfortunately it doesn't work, it comes out as, for instance
J. Harris, William Beveridge : A Biography, 2<sup>e</sup> éd., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997
Sorry for having written upper case instead of superscript, my English is quite rusty!
We've also been trying, but it didn't function as well (in order for the code to appear as such, I put points after every sign):
&.#.x.1.d.4.9.;.
About my first post, to clarify things as the code does not appear as such, the problematic code (between ><) is
&.#.7.4.9.7.;.
Have a look there: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/18074/edition-with-superscript
(and http://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues/49 )