Upgrade StorageStyle request: Renewable agriculture and food systems
Hello,
I have searched the style repository for this or/any similar citation styles, but found none that would be exactly the same.
Thus, I would like to ask for a new one, based on the Vancouver with superscript style.
Differences between the styles:
- after Author surname comes a comma (,), followed by Intitial with dot (.) (eg. Rees, W.). All authors are always listed
- The last author is preceded by "and" (eg. Rees, W. and Wackernagel, M.)
- Last author is followed by year of publication (no month), which ends with a dot (.)
- Publication titles from the internet are not marked as such (no (Internet) in exclamation marks after the title). Also (cited DATE) is not given. Only (Last accessed DATE) at the end of the reference.
- Full journal titles are given
- For books: publisher is before place of publication. They are not separated by a colon (:), but a comma (,).
I think that's about all the differences between the styles. Below I also copied their instructions for references, where they say they're based on the Vancouver style...but prety much different in my opinion.
Oh, and another question - is there a way of having the references sorted by number (eg. instead of 17, 18, 15, 19 it would be better to have 15, 17-19)?
If there is something missing I apologize and will try to provide it if asked for...
Thank you already in advance for your help!
Matjaž
"References are based on the Vancouver system. They should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they first appear in the text using superscript Arabic numerals. Where a reference is cited more than once in the text, use the same number each time. In the reference list please give the names of all authors in the reference, never use "et al". Use full names of journals, institutions, conferences, etc. The
reference list uses no quotation marks, italics, boldface or underlining. Only the names of books and periodicals are in initial capitals. Names of papers, book chapters, pamphlets, and bulletins are not capitalized.
Examples:
1. Leopold, A. 1991. The farmer as a conservationist. In S.L. Flader and J.B. Callicott (eds.). The River of the Mother of God and Other Essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. p.255-265.
2. Brink, R.H. Jr, Dubach, P., and Lynch, D.I. 1960. Measurement of carbohydrates in soil hydrolyzates with anthrone. Soil Science 89:157-166 .
3. Greenland, D.J. and Szabolcs, I. (eds.). 1994. Soil Resilience and Sustainable Land Use. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
4. Arshad, M.A. and Coen, G.M. 1992. Characterization of soil quality: Physical and chemical criteria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7:25-31.
5. Coale, F.J. 1996. Descriptions of the soil test interpretive categories used by the University of Maryland Soil Testing Laboratory. SFM-3. University of Maryland, College Park."
I have searched the style repository for this or/any similar citation styles, but found none that would be exactly the same.
Thus, I would like to ask for a new one, based on the Vancouver with superscript style.
Differences between the styles:
- after Author surname comes a comma (,), followed by Intitial with dot (.) (eg. Rees, W.). All authors are always listed
- The last author is preceded by "and" (eg. Rees, W. and Wackernagel, M.)
- Last author is followed by year of publication (no month), which ends with a dot (.)
- Publication titles from the internet are not marked as such (no (Internet) in exclamation marks after the title). Also (cited DATE) is not given. Only (Last accessed DATE) at the end of the reference.
- Full journal titles are given
- For books: publisher is before place of publication. They are not separated by a colon (:), but a comma (,).
I think that's about all the differences between the styles. Below I also copied their instructions for references, where they say they're based on the Vancouver style...but prety much different in my opinion.
Oh, and another question - is there a way of having the references sorted by number (eg. instead of 17, 18, 15, 19 it would be better to have 15, 17-19)?
If there is something missing I apologize and will try to provide it if asked for...
Thank you already in advance for your help!
Matjaž
"References are based on the Vancouver system. They should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they first appear in the text using superscript Arabic numerals. Where a reference is cited more than once in the text, use the same number each time. In the reference list please give the names of all authors in the reference, never use "et al". Use full names of journals, institutions, conferences, etc. The
reference list uses no quotation marks, italics, boldface or underlining. Only the names of books and periodicals are in initial capitals. Names of papers, book chapters, pamphlets, and bulletins are not capitalized.
Examples:
1. Leopold, A. 1991. The farmer as a conservationist. In S.L. Flader and J.B. Callicott (eds.). The River of the Mother of God and Other Essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. p.255-265.
2. Brink, R.H. Jr, Dubach, P., and Lynch, D.I. 1960. Measurement of carbohydrates in soil hydrolyzates with anthrone. Soil Science 89:157-166 .
3. Greenland, D.J. and Szabolcs, I. (eds.). 1994. Soil Resilience and Sustainable Land Use. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
4. Arshad, M.A. and Coen, G.M. 1992. Characterization of soil quality: Physical and chemical criteria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7:25-31.
5. Coale, F.J. 1996. Descriptions of the soil test interpretive categories used by the University of Maryland Soil Testing Laboratory. SFM-3. University of Maryland, College Park."