Problem with number-of-pages
I have been working on updating a custom 0.8 style to 1.0, adding in some extra elements that are only possible with 1.0 and have got stuck on the number of pages in books.
First of all, my 0.8 style which worked perfectly (showing the number of pages in books) would only validate against the 0.8 scheme if I commented out the 'number-of-pages' section.
Now I have a new style running under 1.0 and adding 'number-of-pages' for books in the right place does not make it show up in the bibliography. The style does validate against the 1.0 scheme, though.
Has anyone had any trouble along those lines? Or succeeded in adding number-of-pages to a 1.0 style?
First of all, my 0.8 style which worked perfectly (showing the number of pages in books) would only validate against the 0.8 scheme if I commented out the 'number-of-pages' section.
Now I have a new style running under 1.0 and adding 'number-of-pages' for books in the right place does not make it show up in the bibliography. The style does validate against the 1.0 scheme, though.
Has anyone had any trouble along those lines? Or succeeded in adding number-of-pages to a 1.0 style?
btw. - number-of-pages does validate in csl 0.81 - which scheme are you validating against?
"Bad value number-of-pages for attribute variable on element label from namespace http://purl.org/net/xbiblio/csl.
From line 115, column 15; to line 115, column 84
<label variable="number-of-pages" include-period="true" form="short"/>"
I have posted the new 1.0 style at gist.github.com/592781
Any reasons why/estimates when that will be possible?
Thanks for pointing this out -- it's an item that I simply missed.
I've filed a simple patch, which will likely go in when the developers have time to look at it.
More specifically, the style here https://gist.github.com/786634 installs without problems in my patched version of 2.1b1 (as above) and produces the desired output with the number of pages. When I try to install it in b4, I get a message about it not being valid csl - despite the fact that it validates correctly.
Any insight on this? According to French citation norms we have to include numbers of pages for books, so this is quite important to me and others.