Upgrade StorageFootnotes misaligning abbreviations and giving wrong abbreviations
I'm having a problem with my footnotes when I give abbreviations in the box for pagination and such.
As an example, I currently have the input as "35 n. 14, 157 n. 1":
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/56nc2ffwfqxk7jwha0yg.png
Still, the output comes out as "35 nn. 14, 157 1"
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/p3bo76tseq16ukpxe1n6.png
This is not a new problem for me. The formatting has always gone wrong whenever I use a more complex entry (e.g., "X n. X, X n. X") beyond "X n. X".
Another question: according to SBL formatting anyways, "chapter(s)" should be abbreviated as "ch(s)." It always comes out as "chap(s)." and there are few workarounds. Any ideas on how to fix that one?
Many thanks.
As an example, I currently have the input as "35 n. 14, 157 n. 1":
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/56nc2ffwfqxk7jwha0yg.png
Still, the output comes out as "35 nn. 14, 157 1"
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/p3bo76tseq16ukpxe1n6.png
This is not a new problem for me. The formatting has always gone wrong whenever I use a more complex entry (e.g., "X n. X, X n. X") beyond "X n. X".
Another question: according to SBL formatting anyways, "chapter(s)" should be abbreviated as "ch(s)." It always comes out as "chap(s)." and there are few workarounds. Any ideas on how to fix that one?
Many thanks.
What you could do though is use the suffix field instead.
Regarding the chap. vs ch., can you share a screenshot from the SBL handbook? (I don't have access to it)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/7nj0ewny9sfcyjufm7dz.png
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/buw0nx40ku7sdwijhwoq.png
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u3006544/wqic41eq0xb2kvu4jhoo.png
That's a good idea about the suffix field in the meanwhile. I'll give it a try.