Should I migrate from using Extra to Original Date?

What are the use cases for moving from original-date: YYYY in the Extra field to using the new Original Date field?

BetterBibtex seems to play nicely with either when auto-generating citation keys that preferentially use the original publication year, so that doesn't seem like a reason to make the change.

It would be very nice to have the Filename Template use the original publication year, if possible, though I can't seem to figure out the syntax to do that using either Original Date or Extra. Is it possible?

I haven't yet tried using it for citations in a paper. I tend to use APA.

And are there other things I should be considering for using Original Date instead of the old method?

Thank you!
Cari
  • Ah, sorry, I just realized that the field doesn't appear for all Item Types. So perhaps there is not an "option" I have to use one or the other, and I just need to use whatever is available..?

    I am still curious if there's a way to set up Filename Template to preferentially use the original date. This is not high stakes, but it would be a nice refinement.
Sign In or Register to comment.