Visualizing metadata with network graphs

The Zotero Maps plugin got me thinking about other cool stuff we could do with document metadata. As it is, Zotero allows a user to record a document's authors, the item and website type, etc. as well as add user-defined tags for ease of reference. Even in a relatively small collection of documents (say, 30-50), there's potentially a LOT of structured information just waiting to be accessed and visualized. Would it be feasible to build a plugin to represents that knowledge in the form of a social network graph? It would be nice to be able to click on a button and see a graph that represents authorship networks (to identify cells of collaborators who publish papers together) or shows the associations between authors and user-defined tags, or tags and papers, etc.

There's another discussion that covers this sort of issue already (http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/12606/a-general-idea-how-to-organize-articles-to-connect-them-within-a-network/), and I would certainly love to see a feature that represents unidirectional relationships as arrows. But there are also bidirectional relationships ("X published a paper with Y" implies "Y published a paper with X", for example) that look like they would be easier to implement. Just being able to define an abstract relationship ("draw a line between any author and any tag that appear in the Info panel for the same paper") would make me happy.
  • Would it be feasible to build a plugin to represents that knowledge in the form of a social network graph?
    This would be make a great plugin, but it's unlikely to be done by the folks at Zotero central, since they have their plates full with core functionality. Fortunately, anyone with skills and/or funding can contribute new plugins, and the Zotero crew has always been encouraging of new development of that sort.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.