Style Request: BibTeX's plain style
Hello,
I am looking for a reproduction of BibTeX's plain.bst style in CSL: http://ftp.cs.stanford.edu/pub/tex/bibtex/plain.bst
Link to the official BibTeX CTAN package with plain.bst and other common styles that have no CSL reproduction (abbrv.bst, siam.bst, unsrt.bst): https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/biblio/bibtex/base
In-text citation:
[1]
[1, 2] (consecutive citations are merged)
Bibliography (the text between underscores "_blabla_" denotes italic text):
[1] John L. Campbell and Ove K. Pedersen. The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success.
_Comparative Political Studies_, 40(3):307–332, 2007.
[2] Isabela Mares. Firms and the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter
to employers? In Peter A Hall and David Soskice, editors, _Varieties of capitalism. The
institutional foundations of comparative advantage_, pages 184–213. Oxford University Press,
New York, 2001.
I give more examples in the screen captures of my next message below. Here is also a publicly available paper using BibTeX's plain bibliography style (and the LIPIcs template): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10057
For the context, I am developing a reproduction of the Dagstuhl LIPIcs article format (https://typst.app/universe/package/para-lipics) in Typst, a modern alternative to LaTeX. However, LIPIcs relies on the old plain.bst style of BibTeX, and Typst only uses Zotero's CSL standard for handling bibliography. Therefore, I'm looking for a CSL equivalent of plain.bst.
I wouldn't be surprised if other publishers, apart from Dagstuhl, also rely on BibTeX's old styles, instead of writing their own CSL style.
Thanks.
EDIT: Added citation examples
I am looking for a reproduction of BibTeX's plain.bst style in CSL: http://ftp.cs.stanford.edu/pub/tex/bibtex/plain.bst
Link to the official BibTeX CTAN package with plain.bst and other common styles that have no CSL reproduction (abbrv.bst, siam.bst, unsrt.bst): https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/biblio/bibtex/base
In-text citation:
[1]
[1, 2] (consecutive citations are merged)
Bibliography (the text between underscores "_blabla_" denotes italic text):
[1] John L. Campbell and Ove K. Pedersen. The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success.
_Comparative Political Studies_, 40(3):307–332, 2007.
[2] Isabela Mares. Firms and the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter
to employers? In Peter A Hall and David Soskice, editors, _Varieties of capitalism. The
institutional foundations of comparative advantage_, pages 184–213. Oxford University Press,
New York, 2001.
I give more examples in the screen captures of my next message below. Here is also a publicly available paper using BibTeX's plain bibliography style (and the LIPIcs template): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.10057
For the context, I am developing a reproduction of the Dagstuhl LIPIcs article format (https://typst.app/universe/package/para-lipics) in Typst, a modern alternative to LaTeX. However, LIPIcs relies on the old plain.bst style of BibTeX, and Typst only uses Zotero's CSL standard for handling bibliography. Therefore, I'm looking for a CSL equivalent of plain.bst.
I wouldn't be surprised if other publishers, apart from Dagstuhl, also rely on BibTeX's old styles, instead of writing their own CSL style.
Thanks.
EDIT: Added citation examples
https://www.zotero.org/styles?q=bibtex
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u14142206/yo90dqgomaq9drseiabf.png
I guess this could be useful for converting across bibliography formats, but that's not what I'm looking for.
This is the plain.bst style I want to get (this is the official LIPIcs LaTeX template):
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u14142206/5njelmmh8dugwlqrk39m.png
And this is the closest result I could get, using the "association-for-computing-machinery.csl" style (this is my Typst LIPIcs-like template):
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u14142206/eq9mizqf78o3vgyfk1no.png
You should be able to adapt that fairly easy.
There is other styles than the one you mention that will be closer though and will require less editing. (PNAS, Frontiers in Optic, Shock...)
See https://www.zotero.org/support/dev/citation_styles/style_editing_step-by-step
And if not that, style guides like APA or Chicago would be published books+online.
The style you show above, where do you get the info that it needs to look the way it needs to look?