Based on the University of South Australia style guide, for an electronic publication the date of update should be shown in the bibliography. There is no "updated" field available, so the next best thing would be to show the "issued" date if it contains month and day.
Apart from the inability to completely suppress the updated date element if month and day are empty, there is also a problem with using the "issued" year since the current Zotero CSL processor has a side effect of disambiguating the issued year (if the disambiguate-add-year-suffix option is set to true).
The new CSL processor (coming up in trunk releases in a few months or so) speaks CSL 1.0, in which the year-suffix element can be applied selectively. I've filed a ticket in the CSL tracker on the condition issue. A simple option would be to allow a condition on one or more macros. This would allow you to define a macro containing a date element that renders only the month, or only the day, and if that returns nothing, to know that that element is missing. It's a flexible solution that might be useful elsewhere, but it's just an idea that I've cooked up on my own: we'll have to wait and see what the CSL group makes of it when discussions begin over version 1.1 (CSL 1.0 is now final, and revisions to syntax at this version level are not possible).
I understand it's not possible to test whether the date field contains the three parts or just one or two.
When there is no "day" information, since the month is placed just after a period, it has to be "capitalize-first", whereas when there is one, it has to be "lowercase".
I didn't understand how to use the fbennett's solution.
Would I dare asking for the coding lines to include in the style so as to obtain the right result? I would be very grateful.
I also want to edit a style so that it prints a date in the case that the "issued" date has a day and/or month.
I spent some time looking for a solution. The problem is that the "if" selector can only test if a "variable" is empty or not. That is, "if" cannot test if a "macro" is empty or not.
What we need is something like this: <macro name="day-month"> <date variable="issued"> <date-part name="month"/> <date-part name="day" prefix=" "/> </date> </macro> <macro name="date-full"> <choose> <if macro="day-month"> <date variable="issued"> <date-part name="month" suffix=" "/> <date-part name="day" suffix=", "/> <date-part name="year" /> </date> </if> </choose> </macro>
Unfortunately, this code doesn't work because there's no such option as <if macro="day-month"> ... </if> I can't think of a solution after reading the CSL syntax summary. I think that we'll have to wait for a Zotero upgrade.
I'm digging this, because google reference it, and I wanted to know if a solution has been done for this? Is it now possible to test for the result of a macro in a if?
Upgrade Storage
Trochim, WM 2000, The research methods knowledge base, 2nd edn, updated 2 August 2000, viewed 14 November 2001, <http://socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.htm>.
When there is no "day" information, since the month is placed just after a period, it has to be "capitalize-first", whereas when there is one, it has to be "lowercase".
I didn't understand how to use the fbennett's solution.
Would I dare asking for the coding lines to include in the style so as to obtain the right result? I would be very grateful.
I spent some time looking for a solution. The problem is that the "if" selector can only test if a "variable" is empty or not. That is, "if" cannot test if a "macro" is empty or not.
What we need is something like this:
<macro name="day-month">
<date variable="issued">
<date-part name="month"/>
<date-part name="day" prefix=" "/>
</date>
</macro>
<macro name="date-full">
<choose>
<if macro="day-month">
<date variable="issued">
<date-part name="month" suffix=" "/>
<date-part name="day" suffix=", "/>
<date-part name="year" />
</date>
</if>
</choose>
</macro>
Unfortunately, this code doesn't work because there's no such option as
<if macro="day-month"> ... </if>I can't think of a solution after reading the CSL syntax summary. I think that we'll have to wait for a Zotero upgrade.Thanks,