Upgrade StorageGlitch with PUR citation style
Hello,
As a French author and working on a manuscript using the Presses universitaires de Rennes (PUR) style, and as a university professor teaching my students how to properly cite references, I often use PUR style in Zotero.
There is a glitch since the last update: citations include the place of edition after the publishing company. It should be the reverse. (See their guidelines to authors: https://pur-editions.fr/pur/doc/consignes_auteurs.pdf)
Taking an example I just used with Word when inserting a footnote, here is what appeared:
BARTLETT Thomas, DICKSON David, KEOGH Dáire, et WHELAN Kevin (dir.), 1798: a Bicentenary Perspective, Four Courts Press, Dublin, 2003.
When it should have been:
BARTLETT Thomas, DICKSON David, KEOGH Dáire, et WHELAN Kevin (dir.), 1798: a Bicentenary Perspective, Dublin, Four Courts Press, 2003.
Can it be fixed?
Best,
Mathieu Ferradou
As a French author and working on a manuscript using the Presses universitaires de Rennes (PUR) style, and as a university professor teaching my students how to properly cite references, I often use PUR style in Zotero.
There is a glitch since the last update: citations include the place of edition after the publishing company. It should be the reverse. (See their guidelines to authors: https://pur-editions.fr/pur/doc/consignes_auteurs.pdf)
Taking an example I just used with Word when inserting a footnote, here is what appeared:
BARTLETT Thomas, DICKSON David, KEOGH Dáire, et WHELAN Kevin (dir.), 1798: a Bicentenary Perspective, Four Courts Press, Dublin, 2003.
When it should have been:
BARTLETT Thomas, DICKSON David, KEOGH Dáire, et WHELAN Kevin (dir.), 1798: a Bicentenary Perspective, Dublin, Four Courts Press, 2003.
Can it be fixed?
Best,
Mathieu Ferradou