Backup but not only the data folder
Hi
I know that the best backup of the Zotero database including files is a backup of the data folder. Which is fine.
But we are looking for a backup which is
1. in an interoperable format with other reference managers
2. includes attached files and preferably annotations
3. can be imported back into Zotero as accurate as possible
The usage would be a backup of a Zotero closed group and deposit on e.g. Zotero (in this case obviously without the attached files).
We are using Zotero RDF at the moment, but what about interoperability and the completeness of the metadata?
Thanks for any suggestions,
Rainer
I know that the best backup of the Zotero database including files is a backup of the data folder. Which is fine.
But we are looking for a backup which is
1. in an interoperable format with other reference managers
2. includes attached files and preferably annotations
3. can be imported back into Zotero as accurate as possible
The usage would be a backup of a Zotero closed group and deposit on e.g. Zotero (in this case obviously without the attached files).
We are using Zotero RDF at the moment, but what about interoperability and the completeness of the metadata?
Thanks for any suggestions,
Rainer
Of the export formats, obviously Zotero RDF is the one that's going to give you the most complete copy of your data, but that's not a true backup and not importable into anything else.
The point of interoperability is not only to be able to run it on another platform with the same program, but also running it on the same or different platform using a different program.
So a different format should also be used. I am inclined to go with in addition to Zotero RDS with bib(la(tex for the interoperable aspect?
One additional question: When I export to `Zotero RDF` with files and to `bibtex` or `biblatex` or any other format with files, will the folder structure be the same if the library does not change between the exports?
1) What is the most interoperable export format from Zotero which can be read by the most reference managers and which can include in the export the attached files as Zotero RDS can do?
2) If I export to two different formats with files, is the folder structure in the `files` folder the same, given that the looter library did not change between the exports?
2) I don't think so, no
1) makes sense - I always forget about his format. I will probably go with Bib(La)Tex, his and Zotero RDS than
2) From comparing it using `diff -r ...` they are identical, but the question is if I can rely on it.
files
folder has directories that are the attachment keys, right? If that's true, and you make no changes to your library between exports, those two exports should be identical, including the attachment-folder names.If RIS isn't missing anything you need I'd suggest using that over biblatex. Zotero must do non-trivial transformations to produce biblatex, and lots of programs claim to produce or consume biblatex with really faulty biblatex generators/parsers that make a mess of things. RIS is much easier to get right than biblatex. There's also MODS XML.
Cheers.