Losing fields when importing into Endnote
Hi all,
Yes I agree that Zotero is superior to Endnote. I am trying to get my organisation to migrate to Zotero, but in the meantime we are using Endnote. My original idea was to export from Zotero back to Endnote only for the purposes of generating bibliographies. However, I have encountered the following problem which doesn't appear to be on the forums. When I import cases into Endnote by RIS, I don't get the reporter or reporter volume field. When I import cases into Endnote by Refer/BibX, I get it but the URL migrates into the page field of Endnote.
So either I end up with no case citation apart from the year, or I end up with the case citation but a %U and then a URL added into the page reference. I work at a legal organisation so this is a big issue. Does anyone have any ideas?
Yes I agree that Zotero is superior to Endnote. I am trying to get my organisation to migrate to Zotero, but in the meantime we are using Endnote. My original idea was to export from Zotero back to Endnote only for the purposes of generating bibliographies. However, I have encountered the following problem which doesn't appear to be on the forums. When I import cases into Endnote by RIS, I don't get the reporter or reporter volume field. When I import cases into Endnote by Refer/BibX, I get it but the URL migrates into the page field of Endnote.
So either I end up with no case citation apart from the year, or I end up with the case citation but a %U and then a URL added into the page reference. I work at a legal organisation so this is a big issue. Does anyone have any ideas?
If you want that field imported into EndNote without modifying the import filters, you'd have to check whether EndNote exports Reporter into RIS or Refer itself and, if so, what fields it uses.
We have Endnote set up so that the 'series' field works as the reporter field. When I export from Endnote into Refer, the series is tagged as %A; and when I export into RIS, the series field is tagged as CY. Does that help, Dan?