Different word for and in citation and bibliography
I try to get following result:
(Müller u. Meier 2020)
Müller, Anna und Beate Meier. 2020. Ein Buch, dass es nicht gibt und niemanden interessiert. 3. Auflage. München: Buchfabrik.
The difference is the word for "and". In the citation, it is supposed to be abbreviated, and in the bibliography it is not.
I can see two different approaches, but not managed to change them so far:
use short and long versions of and
change the and symbol in to something different (i.e. "u.")
Is this even possible, or am I trying something not achievable.
(Müller u. Meier 2020)
Müller, Anna und Beate Meier. 2020. Ein Buch, dass es nicht gibt und niemanden interessiert. 3. Auflage. München: Buchfabrik.
The difference is the word for "and". In the citation, it is supposed to be abbreviated, and in the bibliography it is not.
I can see two different approaches, but not managed to change them so far:
use short and long versions of and
change the and symbol in to something different (i.e. "u.")
Is this even possible, or am I trying something not achievable.
-
adamsmithPretty sure this just isn't possible. I think allowing for and=symbol to be localized is on the list of planned changes for future versions. There's just not way currently to call the short version of "and" if you define it.