Upgrade Storagefbennett
About
- Username
- fbennett
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thanks for the reminder; this had indeed slipped past. I've taken your sample code above, and refashioned it as a small valid CSL 1.0 style (the validator says that strip-periods is not allowed on the cs:name node, so I left that bit out). Running …
-
@adamsmith: You beat me to it! That's a great list of disambiguation requirements among the major styles.
-
Dan, Yay! Cracked it. Just as you said, the solution involved catching a keypress event with _focusNextField(). The specific context didn't have one previously, but I found that (mysteriously), an elem.blur() event had become unnecessary (broke thi…
-
It's useful to know that a misstep will end up in the address bar. The last thing in my trace was _focusNextField(), but maybe a notifier or something had been kicking off an additional event. If I'm able to sort it out, I'll post here again (or if …
-
@marionsd: Please also see my comment on your other thread -- you probably don't need or want by-cite disambiguation, if you are aiming for Chicago Style Manual orthodoxy.
-
@marionsd: You're probably running across a processor bug that was recently fixed. Zotero 2.1b7 uses processor version 1.0.113. The next beta release will contain version 1.0.114 (or higher), which fixes a problem with disambiguation parameters "lea…
-
@marionsd: So glad you're looking into using the by-cite algorithm. There's a story behind that one ... I misunderstood the way disambiguation was intended to work while building the citeproc-js processor, and struggled very hard to get things worki…
-
For reported law cases in many jurisdictions, the "Court Division" (for example, Family Division, Civil Division, etc.) is a necessary element. Not sure how it fits into Bibo, but we do need a field for this. Thread here: http://forums.zotero.org/d…
-
I agree that a "Court Division" field is needed. Posting to top-level sticky thread with a link back here.
-
You're best off waiting for the next beta release to come out.
-
Heard a rumour that it's under Locate.
-
Using the title is just a placeholder function, based on the original heuristic in the "hidden option" duplicates detection code provided by the core developers. Simon has mentioned a number of more sophisticated possibilities, that could be tied in…
-
This bug has been fixed in a fresh processor release that I've just pushed up. The behavior should heal up in the next beta release of Zotero.
-
Yes, it's definitely related to previewing. Zotero invokes the processor twice each time a reference is added to the citation: once for preview, and then once for the citation in the document. A reset takes place after the preview, and that is appar…
-
... but with Zotero itself, I can produce wrong results, although not precisely that wrong result. The source of the problem is not obvious, but we'll get it figured out. It looks like it may be leaking name-limit values across cites during refresh …
-
Using the processor embedded in Zotero 2.1b7, I am unable to reproduce this failure. I'll try installing the latest beta to see if it can be reproduced in Zotero.
-
Ah. I wonder why that would be. I'll take a look.
-
The cites all look correct. What exactly is messed up?
-
Here is the style in CSL 1.0, with et-al set in italics. I haven't run it, but the style validates and should do what you want. https://gist.github.com/827316
-
@luisisa: Is this with Zotero 2.0, or the 2.1 beta version?
-
I've just put up a fresh processor release that fixes this. It should work its way into the next Zotero beta.
-
@migugg: Actually, looking at your screenshots, I think you might have missed something (not surprising, given the complete lack of documentation). After selecting "duplicates view", the context menus for individual colored items will change, offeri…
-
@migugg: Thanks for this feedback. It no doubt adds to the confusion that I haven't produced anything like a manual for this yet. :) One point that might help clear things up a little is that all newly imported items are marked yellow (yellow = pos…
-
Thanks for reporting (and for your patience). This is definitely a processor issue, and will be fixed in a fresh release later today. Look for the fix to appear in the next Zotero beta.
-
Have identified the source of the fault, and shipped a processor update. Many thanks again for providing the steps that replicate the error.
-
Initial testing shows that removing the et-al-subsequent-min="3" and et-al-subsequent-use-first="1" lines will make the lingering year-suffix go away. If you need things working immediately, you can remove those two lines from inside the citation de…
-
Confirmed, thanks for the followup. I'll get on this right away. If the fault is in the CSL processor (which seems virtually certain, from the symptoms), I should have a fix out within the day, for inclusion in the next beta release.
-
I have so far been unable to reproduce this. Is this with an unmodified (or freshly revalidated) version of the Harvard 1 style?
-
The use of et al. is controlled separately for citations and the bibliography. Try making the same change in the citation section.
-
Have you validated you style file? If it is invalid, it will produce weird behavior. Please paste in there, click "Create Public Gist", and then post the url back here. https://gist.github.com/