anark
About
- Username
- anark
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Chicago Style does not include the date accessed. If you switch to APA, for instance, the date accessed will be shown.
-
Excellent, thanks!
-
Adamsmith -- author-date isn't negotiable and works reasonably well. I'm afraid you'd need to be familiar with the specific work and its context to be able to advise me on best citation practices. Thanks for the effort, though. Ajlyon wrote: > I…
-
Rintze wrote: > 53 items (problem already starts after 2008b) Erratic reference sorting has been a problem before. Maybe the fix that was adopted at the time doesn't play well with the upper reaches of year suffix disambiguation?
-
The references don't "collide" in any meaningful sense that I'm aware of. After a certain number is exceeded, Zotero 2.0.3 just stops handling them correctly. In a world where monographs and research papers are the smallest citable entities, 52 ref…
-
Rintze wrote: > you're probably better off trying the change in your local Zotero 2.0.3 copy Let's see, I edited /content/zotero/xpcom/csl.js to: if(newDisambiguate.length >= 1) { var nonZCharCode = lastDisambiguate.charCodeAt(newDisambig…
-
> yours is a very, very rare usage case and not a crucial fix. Fair enough. Thanks.
-
adamsmith: > I don't think this will be fixed in the current plugin, as a new one is > being rolled out Is there a target release date for the new plugin or for a public beta of it? Rintze: > Mea culpa Well, never mind. Do you share Ada…
-
I think I've isolated the culprit: it's year suffix disambiguation. I requested the feature some time ago and have been happily citing authors with more than 26 references in any given year. I'm now trying to cite an author with more 52 references i…
-
Changing the date field in another miscreant Zotero entry did nothing to solve the problem.
-
Discovery: changing the date field of a miscreant Zotero entry solves the issue, technically, but running with incorrect publication dates is obviously not a solution.
-
Adamsmith, I'm using ReferenceMarks rather than Bookmarks. Simon, as mentioned, when I break the document into two parts, the problem goes away, so to come up with the smallest document fragment that produces the problem, I would probably need to r…
-
Alright -- I managed to solve the problem: I simply renamed OOo's configuration directory (/home/anark/.openoffice.org) to something else, created a new, empty .openoffice.org directory and did the Tools→Add-ons→Extensions→Zotero OpenOffice Integrat…
-
Following Dan Stillman's recommendation in a possibly related thread, I set up a new Mozilla profile. This did not solve the issue, however. Downgrading the integration extension from 3.0b5 to 3.0b4 did not solve the issue either: the toolbar is gon…
-
Any progress on this? Based on my testing, I suspect that the date sorting bug is under-reported, and it isn't clear if there's a commitment to fixing it until some time after the 2.0 release when the new citation engine is ready.
-
Does this mean that the date sorting issue won't be fixed until the "old" CSL processor gets replaced some time after the 2.0 release?
-
@fbennett, Thanks for your perspective on the new citation formatter. @adamsmith, I assumed the issue was widely spread because of a few tests I had done on several different operating systems, all of which turned out to be affected by incorrect…
-
I took your word for it that that the patch was going to be in the next update, so I sat back and waited. I might patch it manually if I positively have to.
-
Are you serious? Following the release of Zotero 2.0? For anyone who's working in a field that requires an author-date citation format and who has more than one citation per author per year, Zotero has been utterly broken for months. I find it ast…
-
Reference sorting still appears to be broken in Zotero 2.0b7.5. This seems like one of the most basic things a citation manager ought to get right. It used to work. Then it broke and and has been broken for a long time. What level of priority i…
-
Great, thanks!
-
This is a known bug that's being fixed now. You may wait for the next Zotero update, which will include the fix, or apply it in your own copy of the software right away.
-
Database integrity check: "No errors were found in the database."
-
I'm also getting the same under Windows XP SP2, Firefox 3.5.5, OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, Zotero 2.0b7.4, OpenOffice Integration 3.0a5: Smith, J. (2008, February 19) Smith, J. (2009a, November 5) Smith, J. (2009b, November 4) Smith, J. (2008, August 27)
-
I've just reproduced the same issue under Windows XP SP2, Firefox 2.0.0.6, OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, Zotero 1.0.10, OOo-Plugin 1.0b4: I enter four newspaper articles into a new Zotero database, by the same author, from two years, four different dates, t…
-
For what it's worth, I'm getting the same result using Microsoft Vista Business Edition, Firefox 3.0.14, OpenOffice 3.1, Zotero 1.0.10, OOo-Plugin-1.0b4: Bates, S. (2009, October 24) Bates, S. (2008a, May 5) Bates, S. (2008b, April 2) Bates, S. (20…
-
The correct URL is this: http://bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org/current.dtl There's a page on troubleshooting translator issues, which ends on the suggestion to post your issue to Zotero's Site Translators forum.
-
Using APA citation style under Ubuntu 9.04, Firefox 3.0.1, OpenOffice.org 3.0.14, Zotero 1.0.10, OOo-Plugin-1.0b4, I get the following nonsensical reference sorting: Bates, S. (2009, October 14) Bates, S. (2008a, May 5) Bates, S. (2008b, April 2) B…
-
Can I get this treated as a bug report? On a new Ubuntu 9.4/OOo 3.0.1 install with the latest Zotero 2.0 beta and the latest OOo integration, APA references get sorted in order of their appearance in the text rather than the order of their publicat…
-
I've done some testing. On a brand-new Ubuntu 9.4/OOo 3.0.1 install (as opposed to Ubuntu 8.4/OOo 3.0 in all of the above) with the latest Zotero 2.0 beta and the latest OpenOffice plugin, Zotero's APA-style references list will sort publications of…