Upgrade Storageemilianoeheyns
About
- Username
- emilianoeheyns
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
extra is not a standard bibtex field, no. BBT recognizes some non-standard fields too, but the fallback behavior is to copy it to the zotero "extra" field. The standard bibtex importer might have a different handling, I'm not as familiar with that a…
-
You can just have them in separate non-standard bibtex fields, so something like PA = {Site 71, Site 30} NPA = {xyz, abc, kjhg} Theme = {biogeography, paleontology, habitat loss, amphibians, birds, tenrec, flora and vegetation} I don't think eith…
-
For BBT it is at https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/blob/master/translators/Better BibTeX.ts#L341. If that mapping is incomplete I'd be happy to extend it.
-
BBT would make that tex.extra: Site 71 and Inforamtion on the protected area, biogeography, paleontology, habitat loss, amphibians, birds, tenrec, flora and vegetation in the Zotero item. On export, you'd get exactly that field back in the bibtex ge…
-
Imports with BBT would put all unrecognized fields in the extra field.
-
The main culprit for that would then still likely be me :) but the debs are up to date.
-
I've seen a number of such reports in the past days. BBT is at least also incompatible with 5.0.77, but given how BBT interacts with Zotero, I can realistically only support the latest release of Zotero. Anything that works beyond that is a happy co…
-
I don't think I've seen this show up yet; if you report the issue at https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/ I can take a look.
-
Yeah sorry, that's the one. I saw this earlier but it got drowned out.
-
The way they export bibtex is wrong, but BBT will detect and import it.
-
I'm working on it, but I need to figure out the Zotero field mapping -- there's some things going on that I don't fully understand. I've raised a question about it on zotero-dev.
-
(can the title of this thread be changed to omit BBT? BBT is not involved)
-
I'm still tinkering with the interaction between the filter and BBT a bit, but it works as-is, it's just a bit of cleanup now.
-
Yeah :) It should be fairly easy to make this work with RMarkdown. RMarkdown uses pandoc, and as it's a Lua filter, it should work as-is with any pandoc version > 5.2 (I think). It will filter out citations for which it can find all keys; citati…
-
And fixed. Live references from markdown are go; I'll include the patch and the docs for it in the next release.
-
Found the error.
-
Filter updated on https://retorque.re/zotero-better-bibtex/exporting/pandoc/
-
?!?! if I open the docx file in LibreOffice, save it as-is, and open it in Word, the live markers are present. yay I guess?
-
I have a pandoc lua filter at https://retorque.re/zotero-better-bibtex/exporting/pandoc/ that successfully (as far as I can tell) converts to RTF/ODF scan compatible odt, but I have not yet been able to create a word file with live markers. It *shou…
-
Hey, if it works, it works. The docx format is pretty funky, so if I don't need to touch it that's just fine by me.
-
That's sort of what I was suggesting. If you can get markdown out with pandoc-compatible references, you can use that chain to make a live Word document. I think. I'll run some experiments.
-
How would that addon interact with RoamResearch? With pandoc and a filter, it can be done I think, as the AST seems to have enough information to do it, but if all your notes live inside RoamResearch, at what point would it become an MS Word file wi…
-
If you use a MD processor, it's not at all unlikely that it's using pandoc under the hood. If that's the case, a filter might be able to accomplish this. I could take a stab at this as a proof of concept. Do you have a sample?
-
@dstillman anything I need to/can prepare for in BBT? I have overlays that augment the collections tree.
-
Can you describe the workflow you had in mind, even if just roughly? If you're using BBT, you're probably using LaTeX, and I don't know of a robust way to make Word files out of a LaTeX source, which would be the first hurdle to clear.
-
That's what I've been saying. This only works locally (unless you pin the keys, buth then you're bound to end up with duplicates). For something that syncs, it seems inevitable that you'll either: 1. need an Zotero-external database to match number…
-
Our answers must have crossed, sorry. There's ongoing work in biblatex to provide better support for things like this: https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/1273 https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/416#issuecomment-531138722…
-
additional fields in Biblatex are not helpful if the standard styles (CSL or Latex) are used. Are you by any chance using pandoc? CSL has no connection with biblatex. CSL processors cannot consume bib(la)tex files, so CSL styles can never use biblat…
-
(1) bibtex and biblatex have very little opinion about what fields are in an entry. They do stipulate which fields are verbatim, creator-type, literal-list, title-type, etc, but a lot of the actual work is left to the style in use. "Can work with" i…
-
The itemID is already numeric? Something like [item-id] would give it to you in the citekey.