Upgrade Storageemilianoeheyns
About
- Username
- emilianoeheyns
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
You can make as many groups as you want, even if you are the only member of these groups. Each group acts as its own separate library.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSS6jN_vCbY
-
As a side note: if you use tex.note = what follows must be valid LaTeX, as BBT will just pass it out unchanged. If you use tex.note: BBT will escape as necessary.
-
Hello, I wonder if you have solved this problem, I have installed the "better BibTeX " add-on, but it seems useless. Better BibTeX is hardly "useless". A few thousand Zotero users seem to think otherwise. If you think you know better, please explain…
-
I can't access those logs, and please report this on the github project. That's where I do support.
-
Debug build expire after approximately one week. 7SRC3QIS-refs-euc does not contain the information I need. https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/2490 has a new debug build up.
-
I don't think I've seen an issue opened on this on github, so I'm assuming you have resolved your question.
-
If you open an issue on the bbt github page and submit a BBT debug ID there (one with -refs- in it) I can take a look. On the description above I don't really understand what your current situation is. If you import a bibtex file while BBT is insta…
-
Can't do anything without further feedback.
-
Yes. I understand how things look in your prefs screen, I don't understand why they look that way in your prefs screen. Please install it, turn on debug logging in the help menu, try to change the formula, then send a new debug log. Has the proble…
-
Rename it and change its ID in the header. Or use BBT.
-
The current zotero forums lack a few features that would really, really help (like markdown). Please change this running system. Maybe conservatively. But please do.
-
If you use Zotero exclusively for LaTeX (or at least exclusively for LaTeX for entries that have LaTeX math in their title), Better BibTeX will output marked LaTeX parts as-is.
-
Even the Github "issues" section is a better way to communicate with other users as-is. That is not my experience at all. I use github issues as my preferred way to structure comms around my plugins; the forums do a few crucial things which I *wish*…
-
People use rebiber not for formatting/normalization but for choosing the correct, official citations among the many (valid) available citations for a paper. Which is fine, but I'd recommend talking to the rebiber creators about their mangling of tit…
-
https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/2490 has a new build that contains logging. It is not a fix, just for diagnosis. Please turn on debug logging in the help menu, try to change the formula, then send a new debug log.
-
You can post it here.
-
The new BBT has cut down its startup by half. Still not instant, but better.
-
That link gives me an error, it says that page does not exist.
-
authEtal2(sep='_').lower + '_' + year is a valid formula. It is correct that if the "active formula" screen shows that there is an error in the formula being entered. However, in this very moment resulting citations keys in Zotero look this way:agir…
-
For bugs with the fetcher you'll have to open an issue on https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-pmcid-fetcher/issues
-
If the PM(C)IDs show up in Zotero, the fetcher has done it's work. I'm not involved with CSV export.
-
Once it is started, BBT shouldn't put noticeable strain on a 2.6k library. Autoexports happen in the background, and aside that, BBT doesn't do much. What does BBT increase 3x in your experience?
-
Also, the change that you show above does things it really shouldn't be doing. title={Birds have four legs?! NumerSense: Probing Numerical Commonsense Knowledge of Pre-trained Language Models} is perfectly fine bibtex, and must not be "normalized"…
-
Author1.Author2.etal:lower_year That's not a valid citation key formula in either the old or the new format. Maybe you mean authEtal2(sep=_).lower + '_' + year?
-
Before making the change to the authors, right-click, better bibtex, pin key.
-
This will not affect the citation keys.
-
It will in the version that will drop in 20 minutes or so.
-
With BBT you can add tex.shortauthor: ... and that will appear in the output. Is there a programmatic way BBT could derive the shortauthor from the creators listed in Zotero?
-
This is reproducible for me, so not currently necessary.