Upgrade Storageemilianoeheyns
About
- Username
- emilianoeheyns
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
@adamsmith ah right missed that. Yeah, that display of the citation key is filled with whatever the citekey happens to be -- if it's in the extra field, then that, otherwise the dynamic key, but reordering creators wouldn't affect the key if it is i…
-
If you have some CS students around, it shouldn't be insanely hard to write a script that scrapes the data out. Not easy perse, but doable.
-
@noksagt: the xul-runner equivalent of Chrome is already here through (take your pick) electron (aka atom-shell), NW.js, and if you want something richer, brackets, atom, visual studio code.... and I seem to recall Zotero doesn't actually use xulrun…
-
If we're talking about the bibtex key in the "extra" field, that's almost certainly betterbibtex. But as described by the OP it could easily just be the standard Zotero BibTeX export, as that will generate a cite key during export based on the first…
-
This would also do it (with BBT installed): https://github.com/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/wiki/Scripting-examples#add-doi-in-note-field
-
How did EndNote do it (https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204395)? If this is done by Apple, would it be possible to fake the Endnote side of things so this addin would work with Zotero?
-
RTF/ODF scan (http://zotero-odf-scan.github.io/zotero-odf-scan/) combined with https://zotplus.github.io/better-bibtex/cayw.html, and you'd be pretty much good to go.
-
If you want Zotero on AMO, you'd have to convince the Mozilla crowd to change to post-release reviews rather than (blocking) pre-release reviews. Review lead times vary between weeks and months. We've just fought a huge battle to have non-AMO extens…
-
Let me attempt then to quell the confusion: BBT should yield the same journal abbreviations that Zotero does when it generates a bibliography. I am also quite sure, given the current implementation, BBT actually does. But I'm not perfect, and BBT m…
-
> Zotero styles treat the abbreviations appropriately depending upon the style selected. Which is why BBT has you select the desired abbreviation style to pass into Zotero.Cite.getAbbreviation if you have auto-abbreviation enabled. > However…
-
If this is a problem with Better BibTeX, please lodge an issue at https://github.com/ZotPlus/zotero-better-bibtex/issues ; I don't come here frequently. Journal abbreviation by BBT uses the Zotero abbreviator, so it should get the same output.
-
Better BibTeX exports those fields as verbatim too, so that can't be the problem.
-
Better BibTeX has started exporting the month and year field for BibTeX if it can find those data points.
-
My guess: yashsoni06/wintermario have references with attachments in their personal libraries, and the attachments do not copy over when the reference is dragged to a group library.
-
Ah, super. Thanks.
-
Better BibTeX has had very extensive performance work done in the past 6 weeks or so; unless you are exporting tens of thousands of references, BBT should not introduce any noticeable lag anymore (once the cache is warm). About 15 seconds after an …
-
If there's a bug in BBT I'd love to hear about it; please do file the issue.
-
You can set up BBT to auto-export BibTeX (https://zotplus.github.io/better-bibtex/pull-export.html), and then use one of the BibTeX auto-completers such as (https://atom.io/packages/autocomplete-bibtex) to use the exported file. The result can be ru…
-
Plans have currently shifted a little -- autocomplete is already handled (better) by combining BBT auto-export with the existing BibTeX auto-completers for atom; the zotero-citations plugin instead has implemented the Zotero citation picker directly…
-
This is indeed due to BBT being installed.
-
BBT 0.14.1 now handles this case too. Must have been some strange beast -- given the way BBT works, it means it's an attachment that does have a path, but not a title.
-
(oh and adamsmith is correct when he mentions disabling better bibtex before reporting zotero errors; it wouldn't have been the first time BBT was the cause of what looked like a Zotero error. I have a growing test suite, but it doesn't have 100% co…
-
Hi obsrvng_obsrvrs, I (author of Better BibTeX) am not part of the Zotero team; as such, I don't read these forums as frequently as the Zotero team does, and I can't access the data that's behind the debug ID. I'd hugely appreciate it if you could …
-
(BBT has an active check for 4.0.27 and disables itself if that or a later version isn't found; I couldn't sensibly keep BBT compatible across the changes it introduced. Not complaining, just explaining)
-
(If BBT still won't start on standalone that's a bug -- I used Services.vc.compare to compare the version, and it reports 4.0.27.SOURCE as lower than 4.0.27, which made BBT erroneously report incompatibility)
-
(this has since been fixed)
-
Scrivener is closed-source, and has no extension API. It is because LibreOffice and MS-Word have extension APIs that such integration is possible. You'd have to petition the Scrivener authors to allow for integration.
-
Unfortunately, no; the OPDS protocol doesn't support it. If you find any e-reader that supports sync-back, I'll happily investigate how to support it.
-
(the problem @cjpoor reported has been fixed in the interim -- PDF exports with BBT work again)
-
BBT 0.9.23 adds group (auto-)export (regular export for all translators, auto-export for the BBT translators). WRT performance, the BB(L)T translators have export caching for a modest speedup, but it won't help you with the RIS export.