Upgrade StorageUTF-8 SVN crash on "zotero/extension" access
I am getting UTF-8 encoding errors on every version of svn I can use on windows. I have tried from cygwin's subversion, a command line subversion application, in addition to checking out from Tortoise SVN. I can't come up with any other ideas.
The file that is posing from Cygwin is:
svn: Can't convert string from 'UTF-8' to native encoding:
svn: trunk/translators/Bibliothe?\204?\128que nationale de France.js
from TortoiseSVN, I am getting an error with the same file:
Error processing command 'readonly' in 'extension\trunk\translators'
Can't set file 'extension\trunk\translators\.svn\text-base\Bibliothèque nationale de France.js.svn-base' read-only:
The system cannot find the file specified.
This is obviously due to UTF encoded files in the repository and it seems neither windows or cygwin knows how to deal with it. Please help, as I can't figure out a way to get the rest of the repository without fixing this problem. Is there a TAR somewhere with the same data?
The file that is posing from Cygwin is:
svn: Can't convert string from 'UTF-8' to native encoding:
svn: trunk/translators/Bibliothe?\204?\128que nationale de France.js
from TortoiseSVN, I am getting an error with the same file:
Error processing command 'readonly' in 'extension\trunk\translators'
Can't set file 'extension\trunk\translators\.svn\text-base\Bibliothèque nationale de France.js.svn-base' read-only:
The system cannot find the file specified.
This is obviously due to UTF encoded files in the repository and it seems neither windows or cygwin knows how to deal with it. Please help, as I can't figure out a way to get the rest of the repository without fixing this problem. Is there a TAR somewhere with the same data?
-
ajlyonYou should be able to download and extract the trunk XPI to get essentially the same files.
-
ajlyon[XPIs are in fact zipped directories.]
-
ralesigood idea, I didn't think about this.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.