parenthetical citation with Turabian style
Hi, I want to use parenthetical citation with Turabian style. But Zotero brings up the citation only in end-note or footnote! How can I use parenthetical citation while using the Turabian style?
Is there an official Turabian author-date style guide? If so it's probably relatively easy to make the style - usually Elena (erazlogo) takes care of anything Chicago/Turabian related, she knows the style guidelines much better than anyone else.
As far as I know, if I choose Chicago author-date style, and hit insert citation, Zotero let's me insert an in-text, parenthetical citation with author-date and page #. And if I insert a footnote, this style only provides author date, page # options in the footnote too. However, I've to use the Turabian style, and in that, I'm required to provide all details like author-date, place, publisher and page#. After selecting the Turabian style option in Zotero, it creates perfect footnotes with all publication data, but within the same style, when I try to insert an in-text parenthetical citation with just author-date, page#, Zotero doesn't do that.
I hope I'm making my problem clear to you. Any help will be much appreciated.Thanks.
While that's not possible in Zotero, I believe it doesn't need to be, because you misunderstand Turabian style.
There are two different styles (both in the Chicago Manual and in Turabian). One author-date (or parenthetical) style and one Note or Footnoted style. The former usese author-date, the latter requires full bibl. information in footnotes. They are distinct and you shouldn't/needn't mix them. If you cite something in a footnote in an author-date style you use the same author-date format as in the main text. That is true with 100% certainty for Chicago Manual, and only slightly less certain for Turabian.
If you're convinced that I'm wrong about this, please link to any documentation or a sample document/paper to that effect and we can think about ways to address this.
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/turabian/turabian_citationguide.html
There is no difference between Chicago author-date and Turabian author-date styles.
Edit: What Adam said. If you find differences between Chicago and Turabian author-date styles let me know and I'll create a new style, as I explained to you earlier on this forum.
Really you need to understand that there are two entirely distinct styles labeled Turabian. Right now only one of them exists in Zotero, which seems to trip you up somewhat. Just imagine that "Chicago (Author-Date)" is called "Turabian (parenthetical)". If that makes things easier for you I can actually make you such a style.
They require Zotero to do completely different things and it's only by convention that they have the same name. They might as well be called "Turabian" and "Kate" to distinguish them. Just like you can select between the style for the American Sociological Association and the Chicago Manual of Style, you can select between "Turabian" and "Kate" - so you already have the option you want! - just in a different place.
The Footnote/Endnote option, on the other hand, doesn't change anything Zotero does except for whether notes are printed at the bottom of the page or at the end of the document.
The Field vs. Bookmark option concerns something entirely different and has nothing to do with the citation style itself, but only with the internal, invisible formatting of the Word Document.
edit - thanks Elena - I probably should have done that earlier.
Edit: Many thanks, Adam, for additional explanations--I figured it was easier to add the dependent style than to explain.