SAGE - Vancouver
Hello,
Does anyone know why the SAGE - Vancouver style in Zotero does not actually align with the Sage Vancouver reference style here https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/sage_vancouver_reference_style_1.pdf ? Can this be updated?
Does anyone know why the SAGE - Vancouver style in Zotero does not actually align with the Sage Vancouver reference style here https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/sage_vancouver_reference_style_1.pdf ? Can this be updated?
You need to modify the style manually, unfortunately. It’s a bit of a hassle, but it's still better than fixing every single citation in your manuscript by hand.
The main issues with the default Zotero style are that it uses brackets for bibliography numbers instead of a period (e.g., [1] instead of 1.), it incorrectly puts book and journal titles in italics, and it omits page numbers for books.
To fix this, open the .csl file in a text editor. First, find the line for citation-number and replace prefix="[" suffix="] " with just suffix=". ". Next, search for any font-style="italic" attributes on the title and container-title tags and delete them.
Finally, to add the missing page numbers for books, you need to find the layout section for books in the bibliography and add a call to the page macro () right after the publisher macro, ensuring they are grouped with a comma. You should also find the page macro itself and change its group delimiter from " " to "" to fix the spacing and get "p.51" instead of "p. 51".
Then, save the file and it should work correctly.
If you spot any other errors I might have missed, let me know and I'll take a look.
Please note that the CSL project is separate from Zotero, maintained by volunteers like Adamsmith and myself. Therefore, we had asked for the specific issues to be pointed out so we can fix them. The more you do the pre work the more efficient we can help.
Since OP never said anything after asking, we didn't fix anything.
Based on your description I'll take a look.
So as requested above, specific reports from journals that would like this differently would be helpful. The style is getting used a lot with overall very few issues reported, so I wouldn't assume it's broken for all uses.
With that in mind, the main discrepancy I wanted to report is the numbering format in the bibliography.
The official SAGE guide clearly shows reference numbers followed by a period (e.g., 1. Huff D...), while the current Zotero style uses brackets (e.g., [1] Huff D...).
Thank you again for your time and for all the work you do maintaining these styles.