MHRA with/without bibliography
Why are these two styles different? The style 'with bibliography' uses double quotation marks and places punctuation inside of quotation marks - both incorrect. The 'without bibliography' style does it correctly, but without the ability to generate a bibliography, it's pretty useless for me. Am I missing something here?
http://gist.github.com/228849
download the style by using the "Raw" Link on the top right of the page.
Install by dragging to an open FF window.
please report back if everything works alright.
The styles were written by two different people, the "without note" style is much, much better code (go Rintze!), so it'd be a good idea to shift any MHRA style over to that code.
I'm not quite sure how to proceed from here. There are several considerations:
According to MHRA
"Except when the author–date system (see 11.4) is used or when full details
are given in a separate bibliography, the first reference to a book, article,or other publication should be given in full and later references in an easily
identifiable abbreviated form"
Which seems to imply that there are at least two more possible styles: An MHRA- author date as well as an MHRA-short note - along the lines of what already exists for Chicago style.
For the sake of keeping things simple, I wonder if there is really a need for a "Full note without bibliography" as well as a "Full note with bibliography" style - if people don't want a bibliography, they can simply not insert it. Not sure where that leads, would be interested in some input.
As for the short note, I was rather fantasizing that the plugin would somehow manage that for me - i.e. it would keep track of which reference was the first use of a source and then shorten the rest. Is such a thing pure fantasy at this moment?
I've also noticed that in the new form you uploaded, it places the period at the end of the footnote, which is appropriate. But when I want to add to the footnote (a specific page reference in a journal article, for example, which must appear as '...: 210-260 (p. 253).'), I can do so, but if I refresh footnotes, it erases what I added. Trying to add the specific page reference via the dialogue box when you first insert the reference gets rid of the full page citation for the entire article, replacing it with the specific page.
And as for your final question, I can't imagine when I would need a full note without bibliography - I'd be fine without having that style maintained.
Zotero (and the plugin) are certainly capable - try the Chicago Manual of Style for an example. If not, that will take some more time to implement - you have to redefine a lot of things.
The appropriate way to add stuff to citations (including p. 253) is to use the suffix field in the plugin. My recollection is that the omission of the page range when a specific page is given is on purpose and as required by the style - but as I said, you can circumvent that by using the suffix field.
And thank you for clarifying how to use the 'suffix' field - not sure either how I missed that. The cite style seems to be working perfectly for me now. Thanks again for your help and re-write!
but I doubt very much this is style-related.
I have some "no author" items in the regular test-set that I run all styles through.
So while I look at this, maybe you can see if this couldn't be a coincidence and something else is going on - the "communicating with Zotero" is a known error that can occur for a variety of reasons, including using FF in offline mode.
Can you recommend anything else I should check? (I'm using FF 3.5.5 with Zotero 1.0.10 and Office 2004 for Mac.)
I haven't upgraded to 2.0 since it's still in beta. Is it rather stable?
Also, it seems to remind me that I need to upgrade the document and I have to manually switch the window over to FF when I click add a citation, which is very annoying. Will search around to see if there's a solution to that problem.
I'll recheck it tonight.
sorry about that - I didn't know this would crash entire Zotero - but that's why I ask people to test before uploading styles to the repository.
You can install the corrected style from the location linked to above (same as the last time).
Please report back again.
I've also added the word "New" in the title for the time being, so that you can distinguish between this one and the pre-installed style.
Now I just need to figure out why FF and Word are forcing me to manually toggle back and forth between them to add citations.
Theodor Griesinger, Land und Leute in Amerika: Skizzen aus dem amerikanischen Leben (Stuttgart: Verlag von A. Kröner, 1863), I, 405.
But it should be:
Theodor Griesinger, Land und Leute in Amerika: Skizzen aus dem amerikanischen Leben, 2 vols (Stuttgart: Verlag von A. Kröner, 1863), I, 405.
I double checked - I definitely have the number of volumes in the entry in Zotero.
Is there a quick way to update this?
Thanks again for all of your help with this citation style.
Do a search on the forum for your other problem - the solution depends on your operating system, but it's definitely solvable.
what exactly does it say in your # of Volumes field in Zotero?
It should be an actual number. If it says "three" or "mulitple" nothing will happen.
This is unlikely to matter, but is that still on 1.0 or did you upgrade to 2.0?
Could you export the item in question to Zotero rdf (without file or notes), open the .rdf file with a text editor and post the content here (just copy&paste, but make sure you have "format comments as text" selected?
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:vcard="http://nwalsh.com/rdf/vCard#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:bib="http://purl.org/net/biblio#"
xmlns:z="http://www.zotero.org/namespaces/export#">
<bib:Book rdf:about="#item_16208">
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<dc:date>1863</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>
<foaf:Organization>
<vcard:adr>
<vcard:Address>
<vcard:locality>Stuttgart</vcard:locality>
</vcard:Address>
</vcard:adr>
<foaf:name>Verlag von A. Kröner</foaf:name>
</foaf:Organization>
</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject>read</dc:subject>
<dc:title>Land und Leute in Amerika: Skizzen aus dem amerikanischen Leben</dc:title>
<bib:authors>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li>
<foaf:Person>
<foaf:givenname>Theodor</foaf:givenname>
<foaf:surname>Griesinger</foaf:surname>
</foaf:Person>
</rdf:li>
</rdf:Seq>
</bib:authors>
<z:itemType>book</z:itemType>
<z:numberOfVolumes>2</z:numberOfVolumes>
</bib:Book>
</rdf:RDF>
is what I get (with title in italics and Roman number at the end). That's right (except for the Umlaut, which is already messed up in your export), isn't it?
Could you try how it looks here? (
chrome://zotero/content/tools/csledit.xul
(select the item in Zotero and the style in the top right.)
I'll doublecheck that the style I have posted is the one I'm using, but I'm pretty sure it is. I also definitely never took this out.
I think I've realized the problem - I get the '2 vols' bit when I don't add a specific page reference. Since I've always been adding a page reference, that's when the '2 vols' bit disappears (I've just tested that now in my document). So it appears that for some reason it's suppressing the '# of volumes' element if there's a page reference.
You are pretty sure that isn't a desired feature of the style? The rest was so carefully done that I'm surprised something like that slipped in. Should be relatively easy to fix, though, sometime over the weekend.
That would be great if you can fix it when you get the chance - thanks.
http://www.zotero.org/styles/mhra/dev?install=1
you will still, unfortunately, have two MHRA styles with identical names (you may actually have three, because I've changed the ID of this one) - you can remove the superfluous using the style manager in the preferences.
Please let me know if everything works and once that is the case I'll ask Dan to push the style to clients (i.e. replace the default style that comes with Zotero).