Ibid don't change when a new footnote is inserted before it
Hi,
In OpenOffice, Ibid don't change when a new footnote is inserted before it (Chicago style).
e.g.
1. Cioran, Caiete.
2. Ibid.
3.....
If I insert a footnote after the footnote 1, the result is:
1. Cioran, Caiete.
2. Liiceanu, Title
3. Ibid.
4.....
Ibid. at note 3 isn't correct!!! It doesn't change to Cioran, Caiete!!!
Mihai
In OpenOffice, Ibid don't change when a new footnote is inserted before it (Chicago style).
e.g.
1. Cioran, Caiete.
2. Ibid.
3.....
If I insert a footnote after the footnote 1, the result is:
1. Cioran, Caiete.
2. Liiceanu, Title
3. Ibid.
4.....
Ibid. at note 3 isn't correct!!! It doesn't change to Cioran, Caiete!!!
Mihai
Mihai
For Zotero to work properly with Ibid it needs to handle all the citations. Zotero does not 'see' the other footnotes and does not know that they are citations rather than comments etc.
Thanks!
Thanks,
Marisa
You can also try creating all footnotes manually and just dragging Zotero references into Word.
It might make sense for Zotero to offer a user option to ignore ibid rules in a style?
Surely the best way to solve helen07's problem (where Zotero wrongly uses ibid rules after a manually inserted citation) is not to design a new style that ignores ibid rules, but to make it possible to insert a Zotero "Blank" or "Manual" reference marker that wouldn't print, but that would alert Zotero that there's a manual reference in between its last reference and the present one? Couldn't this be a simple button on the insert reference dialog of the word plugin?
The "no ibid" style is a larger issue--if it is valid to use the Chicago note style without the ibid (which CMS 15 seems to allow), there should be a Zotero style that supports it. I added a Chicago note style without ibid to the Dev Section at http://www.zotero.org/styles/
elena: creating a new style is a short-term solution, but it's not a good long-term one, not least because the primary reason this user wants to turn off ibid is because of a bug. But more generally, a rule like ibid is a soft rule; really an option. I think the correct solution is that Zotero add a preference to turn off ibid handling. Otherwise, we'll have unnecessary duplication.
Sadly, those of us with hundreds (or thousands... sigh) of primary sources to cite are going to have a hard time automating much of the process for those items... though my new ones are actually going into my zotero database.