Bath Harvard - In-text citation in order entered, not alphabetical/chronological
I have been managing my references using the ‘University of Bath – Harvard’ style. Where I reference multiple publications at once, the in-text citations are in the order that I entered them rather than in alphabetical or chronological order. Is there an easy way to fix this?
For example, one of the paragraphs I’ve written is as follows:
PROs are questionnaires [...] (Sztankay et al., 2022; Porter et al., 2016). They can be delivered [...] electronically [...] (van der Veer et al., 2020; Anderson et al., 2019; Oliver et al., 2022; Roberts, Bradley and Williams, 2014). Occasionally, they are delivered [...] with the patient (Holmes et al., 2018).
I would have expected the citations to be in the following alphabetical order:
PROs are questionnaires [...] (Porter et al., 2016, Sztankay et al., 2022). They can be delivered [...] electronically [...] (Anderson et al., 2019; Oliver et al., 2022; Roberts, Bradley and Williams, 2014; van der Veer et al., 2020). Occasionally, they are delivered [...] with the patient (Holmes et al., 2018).
If not alphabetical, I would have expected the citations to be in chronological order:
PROs are questionnaires [...] (Porter et al., 2016, Sztankay et al., 2022). They can be delivered [...] electronically [...] (Roberts, Bradley and Williams, 2014; Anderson et al., 2019; van der Veer et al., 2020; Oliver et al., 2022). Occasionally, they are delivered [...] with the patient (Holmes et al., 2018).
Any advice would be gratefully received.
For example, one of the paragraphs I’ve written is as follows:
PROs are questionnaires [...] (Sztankay et al., 2022; Porter et al., 2016). They can be delivered [...] electronically [...] (van der Veer et al., 2020; Anderson et al., 2019; Oliver et al., 2022; Roberts, Bradley and Williams, 2014). Occasionally, they are delivered [...] with the patient (Holmes et al., 2018).
I would have expected the citations to be in the following alphabetical order:
PROs are questionnaires [...] (Porter et al., 2016, Sztankay et al., 2022). They can be delivered [...] electronically [...] (Anderson et al., 2019; Oliver et al., 2022; Roberts, Bradley and Williams, 2014; van der Veer et al., 2020). Occasionally, they are delivered [...] with the patient (Holmes et al., 2018).
If not alphabetical, I would have expected the citations to be in chronological order:
PROs are questionnaires [...] (Porter et al., 2016, Sztankay et al., 2022). They can be delivered [...] electronically [...] (Roberts, Bradley and Williams, 2014; Anderson et al., 2019; van der Veer et al., 2020; Oliver et al., 2022). Occasionally, they are delivered [...] with the patient (Holmes et al., 2018).
Any advice would be gratefully received.
PR: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/pull/6880