Upgrade StorageStyle Request: Geophysical Journal International
link: https://academic.oup.com/gji/pages/General_Instructions
In-text citation:
(Campbell & Pedersen, 2007)
(Mares, 2001)
Bibliography:
Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K., 2007. The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success. Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006286542
Mares, I., 2001. Firms and the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter to employers? In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 184–213). New York: Oxford University Press.
paper link: https://watermark.silverchair.com/ggt434.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAccwggHDBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggG0MIIBsAIBADCCAakGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMrexe_z4tZO3SdYoMAgEQgIIBejxthJJk0tHudAIfLKRUBrNm4AdcpC_p5usqhM9H33fedRoCkTF7wXEN6knkRZVLqC0p2d6_5q6OyuXWwikjiN3P4GTmt5b9F2K6a6hYllDD7bG0uF9o-eqcZ8LDCFyd5Bqc97n5B9nP1zDYtdUmn7ZZsEMzyceIYcSEr99wFkCgk1HAtWlE0M8OPDUDD1eY6Tyuk7xaH_rIQkk6lCcB_mRwpFTWSs5R_PCg2G-YVxNNlP3KM-X-rbjFCJ88StRIjcpdMWgkDXqhpalrS1odGJcKQe1uYMjvldj0G4iSlbV9TD23uXu2VHDvANnhmqRU5Oeu86hNMstxTCTvWgCxduP2wCAj2SRZ-jKWzVqsCAqjcEnmeemkYHsbagPETBe1GYe4ZV5oyKLyNb7C7yFMOkcLVzUPxcTj27Zq2UM1AwBdYq5KriN61ikrmltvwos-T19lXlMx1MipZ40psB7kpCQszo-yYNncDaAouQ5w8Br6OxMdsyycRDLczA
In-text citation:
(Campbell & Pedersen, 2007)
(Mares, 2001)
Bibliography:
Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K., 2007. The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success. Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006286542
Mares, I., 2001. Firms and the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter to employers? In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 184–213). New York: Oxford University Press.
paper link: https://watermark.silverchair.com/ggt434.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAccwggHDBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggG0MIIBsAIBADCCAakGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMrexe_z4tZO3SdYoMAgEQgIIBejxthJJk0tHudAIfLKRUBrNm4AdcpC_p5usqhM9H33fedRoCkTF7wXEN6knkRZVLqC0p2d6_5q6OyuXWwikjiN3P4GTmt5b9F2K6a6hYllDD7bG0uF9o-eqcZ8LDCFyd5Bqc97n5B9nP1zDYtdUmn7ZZsEMzyceIYcSEr99wFkCgk1HAtWlE0M8OPDUDD1eY6Tyuk7xaH_rIQkk6lCcB_mRwpFTWSs5R_PCg2G-YVxNNlP3KM-X-rbjFCJ88StRIjcpdMWgkDXqhpalrS1odGJcKQe1uYMjvldj0G4iSlbV9TD23uXu2VHDvANnhmqRU5Oeu86hNMstxTCTvWgCxduP2wCAj2SRZ-jKWzVqsCAqjcEnmeemkYHsbagPETBe1GYe4ZV5oyKLyNb7C7yFMOkcLVzUPxcTj27Zq2UM1AwBdYq5KriN61ikrmltvwos-T19lXlMx1MipZ40psB7kpCQszo-yYNncDaAouQ5w8Br6OxMdsyycRDLczA
Please follow this closely and add the missing info in this thread.
https://www.zotero.org/styles?q=id:geophysical-journal-international
Their guidelines lack a lot as well, but the publications seems consistent.
I found the citation style in text and Bibliography for GJI is different from the one GJI uses. Could anyone let me know how to get the updated version for zotero? Thanks.
e.g., zotero uses
Hisakata, R., Nishida, S. & Johnston, A. (2016) An adaptable metric shapes perceptual space. Curr. Biol., 26, 1911–1915. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.047
But GJI uses:
Hisakata, R., Nishida, S. & Johnston, A., 2016. An adaptable metric shapes perceptual space. Curr. Biol., 26, 1911–1915. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.047
Also, in-text citation
zotero uses comma: (Wang et al. 2011, Zhang 2020)
But GJI uses semicolon: (Wang et al. 2011; Zhang 2020)
I've fixed the mentioned issues as well as some other things I noticed.
https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/raw/42ee9665b5cb6c598518f094945bf735c6c4d43f/geophysical-journal-international.csl
I found a small discrepancy between Zotero's citation style and GJI's official guidelines. According to Section 6.3 of the GJI guidelines, et al. should be written in roman, not italic. (see https://academic.oup.com/gji/pages/general_instructions?login=true#References and citations)
I hope this can be addressed.
However, I also found recent examples where et al. is written in roman, for example:
https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/244/3/ggaf505/8442249?searchresult=1
In any case, the fact that many authors use a certain format does not necessarily mean it is consistent with the journal’s official guidelines.
Section 6.3 of the GJI guidelines clearly states that et al. should be written in roman. (https://academic.oup.com/gji/pages/general_instructions#:~:text=For three authors, give all three names at first mention, e.g. (J. Brown, P. Jones & A. Smith 1994), but use first author et al. (in roman, not italic) thereafter, e.g. (Brown et al. 1994).)
In addition to Section 6.3, Section 6.6 states this explicitly:
“The abbreviations e.g. i.e. cf. etc. NB et al. are all roman (not italic). Note the punctuation.” (https://academic.oup.com/gji/pages/general_instructions#:~:text=The abbreviations e.g. i.e. cf. etc. NB et al. are all roman (not italic). Note the punctuation)
Given this clear instruction in the official guidelines, the fact that some published papers still use italic et al. does not override the journal’s stated policy.
Therefore, I think it would be appropriate for widely used reference managers such as Zotero to follow the official guidelines rather than common practice.