Related tab
I'm using the Related tab as links to the references which are cited. I see that when this Related link is created, both sources show the other one as being related. However, there is no indication given as to which direction the relationship exists. It might be useful(at least for me) to have some indication of whether the the particular relation is because it cites the other source or is being cited by the other source.
Also, in this usage, perhaps an optional field for the citation number in the original source?
Thanks! Loving this extension so far!
Also, in this usage, perhaps an optional field for the citation number in the original source?
Thanks! Loving this extension so far!
Thanks for the great job
First save references 1, 2, 3, etc. to Zotero,
then add note 1 to reference 1,
relate note 1 to reference 2,
add note 2 to reference 2,
relate note 2 to reference 3,
and so on
If the directionality is understood to be through note n to reference n+1, a reference sequence could be followed far into the past.
Note n could also be used, for example, to hold a quote of interest taken from reference n.
Hope this works.
Admittedly, though, "related" is so vague as to be meaningless.
By adding relationship by "related" between books and chapters/parts, I get for one a clickable-navigatable list, i.e. a logical relationship is established between the objects, not a mere labelling. Also, such I get full information about the containing work, including author, publisher, etc.
It's quite clear, that enabling a relationship — in a relational data model sense — makes absolutely sense for a biblography application. Not only contained-container information can be realised such (part-book, article-journal), but also e.g. editions of manuscripts to those, or reprints of books to the original, etc.
Also, such a formalized relationship could help to make the navigator part even more usable: you could have in the openable tree structure for each document (which now holds notes and attachments) these sub-parts (i.e. chapters for books, etc.).
Just my 2c...
Has anyone found all the work involved with using "related" tabs worth the trouble and how did you make it work for you?
I read the first several posts regarding "hierarchical structure" that Mark referenced, but I'd like to know - where is the status of that?
Thanks
Wynne