Garbled text when exporting PDF annotations (highlighted text) to notes
Hello,
Congratulations to the developers on the new major version, this brings great improvements and new features!
Just wanted to report a small issue I encountered while testing the new version. With some PDFs, exporting a highlighted passage results in incorrect text (seemingly due to issues with spaces), while copy-pasting the same passage from the PDF reader in Firefox (and also in Evince) works.
This happened to me with a PDF from the following article (paywall, but I could share a copy privately to help with debugging, if needed):
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/270553
For instance, highlighting and exporting the first sentence results in:
(By the way, it seems from the documentation that reporting bugs on the forums is preferred, but I would be happy to create an issue on Github.)
Congratulations to the developers on the new major version, this brings great improvements and new features!
Just wanted to report a small issue I encountered while testing the new version. With some PDFs, exporting a highlighted passage results in incorrect text (seemingly due to issues with spaces), while copy-pasting the same passage from the PDF reader in Firefox (and also in Evince) works.
This happened to me with a PDF from the following article (paywall, but I could share a copy privately to help with debugging, if needed):
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/270553
For instance, highlighting and exporting the first sentence results in:
Instead of:ThomasEdison isahouseholdnam e,thesubjec tofcou ntless press articles and biographies,and theobjectofadulation asagreat American inventor, holder of1,093 patents.
If you need more from my side to help with this, I'd be happy to help make the PDF annotation workflow even better.Thomas Edison is a household name, the subject of countless press articles and biographies, and the object of adulation as a great American inventor, holder of 1,093 patents.
(By the way, it seems from the documentation that reporting bugs on the forums is preferred, but I would be happy to create an issue on Github.)
Zotero PDF reader gives me:
> Soin1956“sourcematerials”includeduranium ore,which inturn seemednuclearenoughtotrump theincreasingly vocal opposition ofpostcolonialnationstotheapartheidsta
Adobe Acrobat gives me:
> So in 1956 “source materials” included uranium ore, which in turn
seemed nuclear enough to trump the increasingly vocal opposition of postcolonial
nations to the apartheid state.