Add note from annotations is blank
Hi! I've been enjoying the updates to Zotero, however, I'm suddenly encountering an issue. In the past I've been able to successfully use the "add note from annotations" tool. Suddenly, this feature no longer works for me.
For example, I have a PDF with highlights and notes that I created in Zotero. When I try to extract the highlights using add note from annotations, a note is created, but the note is blank. No notes or highlights are being extracted. A new note is created but the note is blank.
Does anyone have any ideas about how to solve this? Thank you!
For example, I have a PDF with highlights and notes that I created in Zotero. When I try to extract the highlights using add note from annotations, a note is created, but the note is blank. No notes or highlights are being extracted. A new note is created but the note is blank.
Does anyone have any ideas about how to solve this? Thank you!
D1695862978
You can turn auto-sync back on immediately after doing this.
D1755146792
Yes, this happens for all PDFs
{{if color == '#a28ae5'}}
<h2>{{highlight}}</h2><p>{{comment}}{{if tags}} tags:: {{tags join=','}}{{endif}}</p>
{{else}}
<p>{{highlight quotes='true'}} {{comment}}{{if tags}} tags:: {{tags join=','}}{{endif}}</p>
{{endif}}
② This custom template was valid yesterday, the custom tags:: The fields are meant to work with the notes software logseq, but there is a bug that generates tags: even when no tags are present: characters, but I see that the changelog for version 6.0.5 states that this bug has been fixed, only to have the entire custom template fail as a direct result
PS: Will the next stable release fix this issue and when will the next stable release be available?
Since this is my first time submitting a debug ID,I don't know if I'm doing it right, so I hope this helps you out, and I'll definitely cooperate if there's any further need.
Also, may I ask if you mean above that 6.0.6-beta.2 is already available with tag:: Is the template up yet, and if so, when will the stable version be available?
⇢ I'll install back to beta now and re-debug once
Also still want to ask two questions
① When will the stable version fix this feature
② As shown below, how can I write the template so that there is a soft carriage return between "tag::question,test" in the second line and "It is often assumed" my comment in the first line, so that they will be in one block after being imported into logseq, if they are in two blocks like below, it will increase the operation cost and reduce the efficiency, especially when I have a lot of content in my note editor
“It is often assumed” my comment
tag:: question,test
I encountered a new problem in beta `6.0.6-beta.2+b8d427790`, still about the custom template I used above, in the built-in pdf reader, first open the note editor on the right side, then select a paragraph of text, this time the option of "add notes" will appear, when I try to click this "add notes" button, it does not add the selected content to the right side of the note editor, that is, there is no response to click this button, but when I switch back to the default template, this "add notes" function works again, so I suspect that in the beta I still have problems with this template, so I filed a debug ID
Also, I'd still like to ask for some advice, in terms of my own application scenario. As shown below, how can I write the template so that there is a soft carriage return between "tag::question,test" in the second line and "It is often assumed" my comment in the first line, so that they will be in one block after being imported into logseq, if they are in two blocks like below, it will increase the operation cost and reduce the efficiency, especially when I have a lot of content in my note editor
“It is often assumed” my comment
tag:: question,test