Read/unread
Hi,
A field that would be really useful for me would be a read/unread field or checkbox (like in iTunes with played/not played). That way, I could make a saved search of just those items that I need to read. I know I could do this with tags, but I thought I'd make the suggestion anyway. If it were a field we could sort by that in the main frame. Many times I'm out there collecting references, and not reading any of them!
Thanks!
Callista
A field that would be really useful for me would be a read/unread field or checkbox (like in iTunes with played/not played). That way, I could make a saved search of just those items that I need to read. I know I could do this with tags, but I thought I'd make the suggestion anyway. If it were a field we could sort by that in the main frame. Many times I'm out there collecting references, and not reading any of them!
Thanks!
Callista
Or alternately, make 'to_read' your tag. That way if you want you can mark different levels of desire to read a given thing, with tags that signal:
- to read if I have time
- to read
- absolutely essential. Stop everything and read.
I wouldn't want to counter a recommendation, but tags do let you do the same thing with a tiny bit more work, and more flexibility
I think the best solution would be an option to have all new entries tagged "unread" by default.
This minimizes feature-bloat while retaining the benefit for an unread/read marker.
Tags are perhaps the most generic markers and, therefore, also the most powerful markers, but read-unread should be thought of as a more convenient tagging interface rather than a separate feature. I don't think making tagging more convenient will do any harm, especially for such commonly used tags.
I'm sure I'm hardly alone in finding and storing materials much (much!) faster than I get to reading them. I've been using a tag -- just "[read]" -- but I like the idea of further categories. The problem is that you can't readily see in the main interface if you've read something or not (right?). And while coloured tags would be useful indeed, what happens if you've set colours for multiple tags that are assigned to the same record? Which colour would win?
I think it's a valid concern to avoid bloat, but this is something I've been wishing for for quite some time, and I can't see it being particularly onerous. Really just a boolean flag in metadata?
Thanks for the brilliant work guys!
For example; I've been adding the tag "annotated" once I have read an article and noted it in my annotated bibliography. Now I wish to select all the records with the tag bison that do not have the tag annotated. This would be the same as a read/unread checkbox but I think more generally useful.
Tag --> is not = annotate
(might only be possible in 2.0, not sure)
So for example a defined shortcut could set a certain tag and if I press it again, it could be unset.
This would make it possible to store and tag a lot of data that belongs to a certain topic without typing every tag for each item.
Maybe the shortcuts could be Ctrl-Alt-[num] and a posibility to define the related tag.
Probably it would also be easy to realize the read/unread -problem this way.
Another possibility could be to install another switch - when adding a new item, I could hold Alt pressed or something - that opens a window where I can easily search and select the tags for the item. This could make it easier to keep the database in a good shape and well tagged.
Would you think something like this is feasible?
Is there a function for setting read or unread a column in Zotero? This is very useful. But after the OP has posted for over 10 years, I still don't see this function. May new versions of Zotero will add this function?
Thanks.