Archives of Dermatological Research

kvymazalova
Hello, the citation style of Archives of Dermatological Research is not updated.

Thank you veru much
Regrads,
K. Vymazalová
  • adamsmith
    We'd need a bit more than that. What's wrong with the style as it is? Where is the correct style documented?
  • kvymazalova
    There is another citations style than the Archives of Dermatological Research requires. The correct one is here:
    Reference citations in the text should be identified by numbers in square brackets. Some examples:
    1. Negotiation research spans many disciplines [3].
    2. This result was later contradicted by Becker and Seligman [5].
    3. This effect has been widely studied [1-3, 7].
    Reference list
    The list of references should only include works that are cited in the text and that have been published or accepted for publication. Personal communications and unpublished works should only be mentioned in the text. Do not use footnotes or endnotes as a substitute for a reference list.
    Reference list entries should be alphabetized by the last names of the first author of each work and numbered consecutively.

    Journal article
    Gamelin FX, Baquet G, Berthoin S, Thevenet D, Nourry C, Nottin S, Bosquet L (2009) Effect of high intensity intermittent training on heart rate variability in prepubescent children. Eur J Appl Physiol 105:731-738. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0955-8
    Ideally, the names of all authors should be provided, but the usage of “et al” in long author lists will also be accepted:
    Smith J, Jones M Jr, Houghton L et al (1999) Future of health insurance. N Engl J Med 965:325–329
    Article by DOI
    Slifka MK, Whitton JL (2000) Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J Mol Med. Doi:10.1007/s001090000086
    Book
    South J, Blass B (2001) The future of modern genomics. Blackwell, London
    Book chapter
    Brown B, Aaron M (2001) The politics of nature. In: Smith J (ed) The rise of modern genomics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 230-257
    Online document
    Doe J (1999) Title of subordinate document. In: The dictionary of substances and their effects. Royal Society of Chemistry. Available via DIALOG. http://www.rsc.org/dose/title of subordinate document.
    Accessed 15 Jan 1999
  • adamsmith
    So the problem is that it's not alphabetical, right? Otherwise the style looks good to me?

    Does https://www.zotero.org/styles?q=id:springer-basic-brackets-no-et-al-alphabetical work?
  • kvymazalova
    Yes. The editor wrote:
    The references should be listed by alphabet using the first author's last name. The references in the reference list are subsequently numbered (1,2,3.... ). This numbering reflects the listing by the author's name and is not chronologically - it does not reflect the citation order within the text. Thus for example the first reference cited within the text can have a number > 1 (e.g. 9). (As a result of these changes you also need to change the reference numbers within the text.)
  • kvymazalova
    And I definitely try springer-basic-brackets-no-et-al-alphabetical.
Sign In or Register to comment.