Style Request: Journal of Integrated OMICS

Or a recommendation if there is a very similar style. Thanks!
Examples:
Published Papers:

Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685.
Brusic V, Rudy G, Honeyman G, Hammer J, Harrison L (1998) Prediction of MHC class II- binding peptides using an evolutionary algorithm and artificial neural network. Bioinformatics 14: 121-130.
Doroshenko V, Airich L, Vitushkina M, Kolokolova A, Livshits V, et al. (2007) YddG from Escherichia coli promotes export of aromatic amino acids. FEMS Microbiol Lett 275: 312-318.

Note: Please list the first five authors and then add "et al." if there are additional authors.
Electronic Journal Articles Entrez Programming Utilities

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25500/

Books:

Baggot JD (1999) Principles of drug disposition in domestic animals: The basis of Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology. (1stedn), W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, Toranto.
Zhang Z (2006) Bioinformatics tools for differential analysis of proteomic expression profiling data from clinical samples. Taylor & Francis CRC Press.

Conferences:

Hofmann T (1999) The Cluster-Abstraction Model: unsupervised learning of topic hierarchies from text data. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  • edited June 23, 2016
    First of all, please follow instruction on https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/wiki/Requesting-Styles

    Similar style you can find by example on http://editor.citationstyles.org/searchByExample/

    EDIT: your examples have a completely different structure as examples for author on JIOMICS page http://www.jiomics.com/index.php/jio/information/authors. Do you mean different journal?
  • Withdrawing request as I found what I needed although it didn't show up in my first search.
    Examples copied directly from the author notes on their site.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.