Chicago no-ibid. comma

I use Chicago no-ibid. However in Englisch comma's are like: 'house'
But in Dutch it is "huis". This however is old-fashioned. Ik would like to have the same comma's as in Englisch: 'huis'. Is this possible?
  • This however is old-fashioned.
    Do you know of any Dutch style guides that discuss whether single or double quotes should be used? If there is consensus that single quotes are more popular, we can change this for all Dutch styles.

    https://onzetaal.nl/taaladvies/advies/enkele-aanhalingstekens and https://onzetaal.nl/taaladvies/advies/aanhalingstekens-dubbele-aanhalingstekens seem to indeed suggest that single quotes might be better.
  • edited June 9, 2016
    In several (the most?) guides for citations (eg. VU-University) single quotes are preferred (=required)for book sections or journal articles. Titles of books are in italics.

    See further: http://specials.han.nl/themasites/studiecentra/verwerken-en-delen/bronnen-vermelden/apa-normen-citeren-en-par/
    AND www.geschiedenisdocent.nl/.../richtlijnen_voor_historisch_onderzoek%5B1%5D.doc
  • Can you fix the second link?

    The han.nl link seems to use double quotes, though, e.g.:
    ("Sociale media", 2014).
    (at http://specials.han.nl/themasites/studiecentra/verwerken-en-delen/bronnen-vermelden/apa-normen/)
  • And coming back to your original question: yes, it's possible to create a custom style that uses single quotation marks instead of double ones for Dutch. You would have to redefine the quotation mark terms, e.g. by adding the following code block to the style:


    <locale xml:lang="nl">
    <terms>
    <term name="open-quote">‘</term>
    <term name="close-quote">’</term>
    <term name="open-inner-quote">“</term>
    <term name="close-inner-quote">”</term>
    </terms>
    </locale>
  • Thanks for your Input!
    As for the single or double quotes, there seem to be different opinions!

    Thanks for answering!

    Hans

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.