Style Error: [Environmental Technology]

gchuptost
Hello,

there is a problem with "Environmental Technology" style

Here's the :
- "Environmental Technology" style displayed by Zotero
6. Arimi MM, Zhang Y, Götz G, Kiriamiti K, Geißen S-U. Antimicrobial colorants in molasses distillery wastewater and their removal technologies. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2014 Feb;87:34–43.

- "Environmental Technology" style displayed by Environmental Technology (Taylor and Francis)
[14] Tidåker P, Kärrman E, Baky A, et all. Wastewater management integrated with farming - an environmental systems analysis of a Swedish country town. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006;47:295–315.

Here's an extract of Taylor & Francis Standard Reference Style
More than 3 authors : "Author AA, Author BB, Author CC, et al. Title of article. Abbreviated Journal Title. 2012;62:112–116."

Thank you for your help
  • gchuptost
    Hello,

    no one could fix this problem ?
    Thank you for your help
  • noksagt
    What are the exact changes you think need to be made & what is your source for deciding that they should be changed?
  • adamsmith
    we're doing the et. al. wrong and there shouldn't be a month (that's true across Taylor and Francis NLM-type styles) via http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/authors/style/reference/tf_NLM.pdf

    There's the question on the citation number format in the bibliography, which the styleguide is silent on (i.e. 6. vs. [6])
  • adamsmith
    The style is now fixed. The updated version will appear on the repository within 30mins. Update your copy of the style by clicking "Update Now" in the General tab of the Zotero preferences.

    Styles also update automatically within 24hs for Zotero 4.0+
    In an existing document, you may have to switch to a different style and back for the changes to take effect once the style is updated.
    Any further problems please let us know & thanks for reporting
  • gchuptost
    Thank you a lot !
    All is perfect now !
    Have a good day !

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.